|
11 physics questions for the new century
Quaking Aspen, a member of the Populus genus.
Click here for more photos.
|
February 18, 2002—The Discover
article, 11
Greatest Unanswered Questions of Physics,"
by Eric Haseltine, tells a tale of modern physics about
two scientists working in different fields—one
studying huge objects far from Earth with the world's
most powerful telescope, and the other studying tiny
objects (particles) with the world's best microscope.
As they focus their instruments on ever more distant
and ever more minuscule objects, they begin to observe
structures and behaviors never before seen—or imagined.
They are excited but frustrated because their observations
don't fit existing theories, so they begin to work together
to find the answers.
In framing the report on which this article was based,
the National
Research Council's Committee on Physics of the Universe
developed a list of 11 particularly direct questions
about the cosmos, some of which have a good chance of
being answered within the next decade. Each question
reveals the interdependence between discovering the
physical laws that govern the universe and understanding
its birth and evolution and the objects within it. Approaching
these questions from a perspective that includes both
astronomy and physics requires a cross-cutting strategy
that combines the tools and techniques of both disciplines—telescopes
and accelerators, and space-based and ground-based instruments.
Some research collaboration of this kind is already
in motion between the two disciplines and among the
three U.S. science funding agencies, the U.S.
Department of Energy (DOE), NASA,
and the National Science
Foundation (NSF).
DOE's Office
of High Energy and Nuclear Physics supports research
on all 11 questions, as illustrated in the examples
below.
1. What is dark matter?
Astronomers have shown that the objects in the universe
from galaxies a million times smaller than ours to the
largest clusters of galaxies are held together by a
form of matter that is not what we are made of and that
gives off no light. This matter probably consists of
one or more as-yet-undiscovered elementary particles,
and aggregations of it produce the gravitational pull
leading to the formation of galaxies and large-scale
structures in the universe. At the same time these particles
may be streaming through our Earth-bound laboratories.
Recent results from accelerator experiments at the
Liquid
Scintillator Neutrino Detector (LSND at DOE's Los
Alamos National Laboratory and underground detectors,
Sudbury
Neutrino Observatory (SNO) in Canada and Super-Kamiokande
in Japan, give strong evidence that neutrinos "oscillate"
among various types and must therefore have mass. Although
it is a very small mass, the vast numbers of neutrinos
in the universe could add up to a substantial total
mass and contribute to dark matter in part. New accelerator
experiments, MiniBooNE
and MINOS at
DOE's Fermi National Laboratory,
will study neutrino oscillations and mass.
Other, as yet undiscovered, particles might exist;
for example, a new symmetry called supersymmetry predicts
a large new class of particles, some of which could
explain dark matter. Experiments now running at the
Fermilab
Tevatron and planned for the Large
Hadron Collider (LHC) under construction in Switzerland
by CERN,
the European Organization for Nuclear Research, will
search for supersymmetric particles, as will experiments
deep underground in the Cryogenic
Dark Matter Search (CDMS) and in space with the
Gamma-ray Large
Area Space Telescope (GLAST).
The
Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer is under construction
and will be on the International Space Station starting
in 2004 to search for any evidence of antimatter galaxies
and for the mysterious dark matter that carries much
of the mass of our galaxy. This project is led by the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) with worldwide
collaboration in which the DOE and NASA play a significant
role.
2. What is dark energy?
Recent measurements indicate that the expansion of
the universe is speeding up rather than slowing down.
This conclusion goes against the fundamental idea that
gravity is attractive. If these measurements hold up,
they require the presence of a form of matter dubbed
"dark energy" whose gravity is repulsive rather than
attractive.
Detailed measurement of the rate of expansion can help
distinguish among the various theoretical models that
have been advocated to account for dark energy. Researchers
at DOE's Lawrence Berkeley
National Laboratory's (LBNL's) Supernova
Cosmology Project are using data from observing
Type Ia supernovae to obtain a direct measurement of
the accelerating expansion of the universe. Large numbers
of galaxies must be observed to study this type of supernovae
since there is only one Type Ia supernova per galaxy
every 400 years. This collaboration uses the Chilean
telescope, the Keck telescope, and the Hubble
telescope to observe and collect data on Type Ia supernovae.
Only 25 supernovae have been thoroughly studied to
date, using the Hubble telescope, but in January 2003,
a new effort dubbed "the Supernova Factory" will start
using the Near Earth
Asteroid Tracking (NEAT) telescope at Haleakala
and Palomar I and II to obtain a Type Ia supernova near
peak luminosity every other night. These observations
will produce 50 gigabytes of data per night, which will
be processed by the National
Energy Research Supercomputing Center (NERSC) supercomputers
in collaboration with the French
Observations Group for Supernovae (FROGS).
The NERSC
supercomputers can produce simulations that will
support other data-gathering methods leading to direct
measurements of nucleosynthesis from the progenitor
star, through the intermediate star during a supernova,
to the core star after the supernova.
The simulations produced by NERSC supercomputers can
also be used for the SuperNova
Acceleration Probe (SNAP) satellite, another project
led by the LBNL's Supernova Cosmology Project and the
High-Z Supernova Search Team, which is under development
to study the acceleration of the expansion of the universe.
3. How were the heavy elements from iron
to uranium made?
Scientist's understanding of the production of elements
up to iron in stars and supernovae is fairly complete,
but the precise origin of the heavier elements from
iron to uranium remains a mystery.
DOE supports theoretical and experimental studies of
nuclear reactions that take place in supernovae as well
as computer simulations of these violent stellar explosions.
Much more information is needed about the extremely
short-lived nuclei that take part in the complex chain
of reactions. A new facility called the Rare
Isotope Accelerator (RIA) has been proposed to study
the full range of nuclei that can exist in nature. Data
obtained from RIA, together with supernovae simulations
using the most powerful computers available, will take
scientists much closer to a full understanding of the
origin of the heavy elements.
4. Do neutrinos have mass?
Cosmology tells us that neutrinos must be abundantly
present in the universe today. Physicists have recently
found increasing evidence that they have a small mass.
There may even be additional types of neutrinos beyond
the three of the current standard models.
First results released from the Sudbury
Neutrino Observatory (SNO) in Canada, combined with
results of the Super-Kamiokande
experiment in Japan, explain the missing solar neutrinos
and add to the growing evidence that neutrinos have
mass. Both experiments are international efforts with
substantial support from DOE.
A long baseline neutrino detection experiment called
MINOS
is currently being assembled at Fermilab and in Minnesota,
and a dedicated beam of neutrinos called NuMI
is being built for it. With this new facility, Fermilab
scientists will have the opportunity to confirm early
indications that the neutrino has a small mass and,
if it does, to make precise mass measurements.
The Liquid
Scintillator Neutrino Detector (LSND) at Los Alamos
found evidence in 1995 that muon neutrinos change into
electron neutrinos. A new detector at Fermilab called
MiniBooNE
will investigate this phenomenon, collecting much more
data than LSND due to a stronger neutrino beam. The
MiniBooNE neutrino beam will consist of high-intensity
pulses about 10,000 times shorter than the LSND beam.
This greatly improves the experiment's capability of
separating beam-induced neutrino events from naturally
occurring cosmic-ray nteractions, which take place at
random times.
Our current theory assumes that neutrinos have no mass
at all. A neutrino mass would require that the theory
be modified and would help to explain at least part
of the dark matter that makes up 90% of the universe.
The source of mass for neutrinos, and all other leptons
and quarks, is believed to be a unique interaction due
to a "Higgs field," transmitted by the Higgs boson.
This boson is the subject of an intense search at the
Fermilab Tevatron. If not found at the Tevatron, the
Higgs will probably be found at the CERN LHC, with substantial
participation by DOE scientists.
5. Where do ultra-energy particles come
from?
Physicists have detected an amazing variety of energetic
phenomena in the universe, including beams of particles
of unexpectedly high energy but of unknown origin. In
laboratory accelerators, we can produce beams of energetic
particles, but the energy of these cosmic rays far exceeds
any energies produced on Earth.
The 1,000 square mile
Pierre Auger Observatory is an international project
under construction to study very high energy cosmic
rays. Colliding galaxies, like those at left, are mechanisms
that form extremely high energy cosmic rays. The Pierre
Auger Observatory in Argentina will be completed by
2003 and will boast a cosmic ray detector spread out
over an area ten times that of Paris! The DOE and the
NSF share equally in the U.S. contribution to the funding
for the construction of the Auger Observatory Site in
Argentina.
6. Is a new theory of light and matter
needed to explain what happens at very high energies
and temperatures?
Matter and radiation in the laboratory appear to be
extraordinarily well described by the laws of quantum
mechanics, electromagnetism, and their unification as
quantum electrodynamics. The universe presents us with
places and objects, such as neutron stars and the sources
of gamma ray bursts, where the energies are far more
extreme than anything we can reproduce on Earth in order
to test these basic theories.
The Gamma Ray
Large Area Telescope (GLAST) will open this high-energy
world to exploration by observing high-energy gamma
rays from many different astrophysical sources. GLAST
will have an imaging gamma-ray telescope vastly more
capable than instruments flown previously, as well as
a secondary instrument to augment the study of gamma-ray
bursts.
The universe is largely transparent to gamma rays in
the energy range of GLAST. Energetic sources near the
edge of the visible universe can be detected by the
light of their gamma rays. There is good reason to expect
that GLAST will see known classes of sources to the
first billion years after the Big Bang, or even greater
if the sources existed at earlier times. The small interaction
cross sections for gamma rays also means that gamma
rays can provide a direct view into nature's highest-energy
acceleration processes. Gamma rays point back to their
sources, unlike cosmic rays, which are deflected by
magnetic fields.
With GLAST, astronomers will have a superior tool to
study how black holes, notorious for pulling matter
in, can accelerate jets of gas outward at fantastic
speeds. Physicists will be able to study subatomic particles
at energies far greater than those seen in ground-based
particle accelerators. For this unique endeavor that
brings astrophysics and particle physics research together,
NASA is teaming with DOE and other institutions in France,
Germany, Japan, Italy, and Sweden. The launch of GLAST
is scheduled for March of 2006.
7. Are there new states of matter at ultrahigh
temperatures and densities?
The theory of how protons and neutrons form the atomic
nuclei of the chemical elements is well developed. At
extremely high densities and temperatures, protons and
neutrons may "dissolve" into an undifferentiated "soup"
of quarks and gluons, which can be probed in heavy-ion
accelerators. Still higher densities occur and can be
probed in neutron stars and the early universe.
The Relativistic
Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) is in operation at the
DOE's Brookhaven National
Laboratory to study of extremely hot, dense nuclear
matter. It collides beams of gold nuclei at energies
sufficient to form brief microcosms of the hot, dense
soup of elementary particles (quarks and gluons) that
previously existed only for the first microseconds after
the Big Bang origin of our universe. The experimental
data to date have revealed unexpected characteristics
and provide the first tantalizing clues of possible
quark-gluon plasma formation.
Physicists around the world are interested in the RHIC
collisions, which occur thousands of times per second.
Each one acts as a microscopic pressure cooker, producing
temperatures and pressures more extreme than exist now
even in the cores of the hottest stars. In fact, the
temperature inside a RHIC collision can exceed 1,000,000,000,000
degrees above absolute zero—about ten thousand
times the temperature of the sun. Although RHIC collisions
may be super-fast and super-hot, which makes them interesting
to physicists, they're too small and too brief to be
dangerous.
In a RHIC experiment using the massive
PHENIX detector, the impact of two gold nuclei ejected
fewer particles transverse to the collision axis than
standard theory predicts. This is the first indicator
of an exotic state of matter, but much more evidence
is needed. By combining this finding with many to come
in the next few years, researchers may be able to understand
a state of matter that hasn't existed since the dawn
of the universe.
8. Are protons unstable?
The matter of which we are made is the tiny residue
of the annihilation of matter and antimatter that emerged
from the earliest universe in not-quite-equal amounts.
The existence of this tiny imbalance may be tied to
a hypothesized instability of protons, the simplest
form of matter, and to a slight preference for the formation
of matter over antimatter built into the laws of physics.
Because it would imply the instability of all nuclear
matter, the discovery of proton decay would be an historic
event. Much effort has already been devoted to the search
for proton decay. This was the principal original goal
of the Kamiokande
and the Super-Kamiokande
detectors in Japan and the Irvine-Michigan-Brookhaven
(IMB) and Soudan
detectors in the United States. Though no protons were
observed to decay, the scientists working there made
impressive discoveries in neutrino physics, as mentioned
previously in question #4.
At the Stanford
Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC), the B-Factory
and its BaBar detector have an opportunity to explain
the vast preponderance of matter over antimatter in
the universe by studying B mesons. Electrons and positrons
colliding at energies of several billion electron volts
allow the study of an asymmetry in the way B mesons
decay into other particles. The asymmetry is known as
Charge-Parity (CP) violation and was first discovered
in 1964. Still not fully understood, CP violation is
believed to be at least partly responsible for the survival
of more matter than antimatter after the Big Bang origin
of the universe. Investigating this important asymmetry
will also extend our understanding of elementary particles.
B-factory physicists have already found striking
differences between matter and anti-matter in the
decays of the heavy, short-lived particles called B
mesons.
9. What is gravity?
Black holes are ubiquitous in the universe, and their
intense gravity can be explored. The effects of strong
gravity in the early universe have observable consequences.
Einstein's theory should work as well in these situations
as it does in the solar system. A complete theory of
gravity should incorporate quantum effects—Einstein's
theory of gravity does not—or explain why they
are not relevant.
High energy and nuclear physics theorists study string
theories and the possibility of extra spatial dimensions,
which could help to explain quantum aspects of gravity.
Experiments at high energy colliders like the Tevatron
at Fermilab and LHC at CERN will be able to test
some of these ideas in the next few years. String theories
have already led to calculations of the entropy of black
holes, a meeting place of quantum ideas and gravity.
10. Are there additional dimensions?
In trying to extend Einstein's theory and to understand
the quantum nature of gravity, particle physicists have
posited the existence of spacetime dimensions beyond
those that we know. Their existence could have implications
for the birth and evolution of the universe, could affect
the interactions of the fundamental particles, and could
alter the force of gravity at short distances.
The HENP's research into string theories suggests extra
dimensions, as discussed in question #9. Experiments
at the Tevatron and other colliders will search for
evidence of extra dimensions by looking for missing
energy in the particles produced in a collision of two
accelerated particles, such as the proton and an antiproton
at the Tevatron accelerator.
11. How did the Universe begin?
There is evidence that during its earliest moments
the universe underwent a tremendous burst of additional
expansion, known as inflation, so that the largest objects
in the universe had their origins in subatomic quantum
fuzz. The underlying physical cause of this inflation
is a mystery.
The Sloan Digital Sky
Survey (SDSS) project, which observes the visible
universe from a 2.5 meter telescope at Apache
Point Observatory in New Mexico may shed some light
on the inflation mystery after it completes its mission
of systematically mapping one-quarter of the entire
sky, producing a detailed image of it and determining
the positions and absolute brightness of more than 100
million celestial objects. It will also measure the
distance to a million of the nearest galaxies, giving
us a three-dimensional picture of the universe through
a volume one hundred times larger than that explored
to date. Ultimately, it will give us an unprecedented
knowledge of the distribution of matter to the edge
of the visible universe. This will provide information
about the primordial fluctuations in mass density, which
should have been the result of inflation.
###
Related Web Links
Connecting
Quarks with the Cosmos: 11 Science Questions for the
New Century, draft report from the National
Research Council Committee on Physics of the Universe
Interactions
of Matter, Space, and Time—Research at Fermilab:
Fermilab's program overview of experiments regarding
interaction of matter, space, and time includes the
question of how to incorporate the study of quantum
gravity into particle physics.
"Interactions,
the Science of Matter, Space, and Time" High
Energy Physics Advisory Panel (HEPAP) Briefing Book
"Signs of
Quark-Gluon Plasma?" Physical Review Focus,
American Physical Society (December 21, 2001).
New Particles, New Physics
Quantum Gravity
"Stability of Protons", Inquiring Minds, Fermilab
Particle Physics for Regular People—Recommended
Readings
Acronyms
of High Energy Physics
The
Particle Adventure
RHIC
Begins Colliding High-Energy Polarized Protons
Future
Top Physics at the Tevatron and LHC
CDMS
Experiment: THE CFPA CRYGENIC DARK MATTER SEARCH
Acknowledgments:
More than one billion dollars per
year is provided by the U.S. Department of Energy
for high energy and nuclear physics research, involving
about 3000 researchers and 1000 graduate students
from more than 130 universities and 10 national
laboratories. The DOE's Office of High Energy and
Nuclear Physics manages this research within two
divisions: High
Energy Physics and Nuclear
Physics.The editor would like to thank the following
individuals for assistance in compiling the information
and reviewing the facts of this article:
Neil V. Baggett, Special Assistant
for Policy and Communications, Office of High Energy
and Nuclear Physics, DOE's Office of Science
David P. Goodwin, Physical Scientist,
Office of High Energy and Nuclear Physics, DOE's
Office of Science
Mike Riordan, DOE's Stanford Linear
Accelerator Center
Peter Rosen, Associate Director
of the Office of High Energy and Nuclear Physics,
DOE's Office of Science
Robin Staffin, Deputy Associate
Director for the Office of High Energy and Nuclear
Physics, DOE's Office of Science
|