[ Back to EurekAlert! ] Public release date: 14-Feb-2000
[ | E-mail | Share Share ]

Contact: Kara Gavin
UMHSmedia@umich.edu
734-764-2220
University of Michigan Health System

U-M health leaders offer an innovative framework for keeping academic medicine viable

ANN ARBOR, Mich. - Even as medical centers and hospitals around the nation are struggling, merging or even closing, the University of Michigan Health System has a favorable balance sheet, a positive operating margin and plans for new initiatives in research, technology, facilities and patient care.

How can this be possible in an age of managed care, government spending cuts, declining medical school applications, negative stereotypes of university medical centers and increasing demand for high-tech treatments? Only through a coordinated effort among the teaching, research and patient care areas of one of the nation's largest and oldest academic medical centers, say U-M Health System leaders.

In an editorial published in this week's issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association, top U-M health officials discuss what they have done since 1996 and plan to do in coming years to stay ahead of the turmoil that currently troubles other health care providers in this time of change. The piece appears in an edition of JAMA entirely devoted to the U-M in honor of the 150th anniversary of the University's Medical School.

"Instead of viewing our academic missions as costly burdens on patient care, we have reaffirmed our commitment to integrating medical practice with education and research," says lead author Gilbert S. Omenn, M.D., Ph.D., U-M executive vice president for medical affairs and CEO of the Health System. "Today, we are proactively shaping our own destiny."

Omenn's co-authors span a spectrum of U-M leadership: Allen S. Lichter, M.D., dean of the Medical School; Larry Warren, M.A., executive director, hospitals and health centers; and Lee C. Bollinger, J.D., University president and chair of the hospital executive board.

"Institutions that can respond to change while remaining focused on service, productivity and market leadership will shape a positive future for academic medicine," explains Omenn. "We are confident that we will be among those leaders."

The editorial recounts how the U-M's health leadership began its course of preventive measures in 1996. At the time, they faced a modest operating deficit, pressure from employers and payers to reduce the average cost for treating a patient, disagreements among hospital and Medical School leaders, constrained funding from the National Institutes of Health due to Congressional cuts, and a lack of facilities where more medical students could be trained as generalists rather than specialists.

But instead of separating the hospital from the rest of the University, or merging with other providers, as other academic medical centers have done in the face of similar challenges, the U-M began to shape its own health care future.

Today, the Health System sees more patients than ever before, maintains a positive financial margin, has reduced its average cost per patient by 20 percent. It also has attracted research support in amounts that make it the ninth largest recipient of NIH funding and help the U-M's research expenditures amount to the largest in the nation.

Among the innovations, improvements and adjustments the authors cite:

Organization

Customer service

Cost-cutting

Innovation in education and research

"As we celebrate the 150th anniversary of medicine at Michigan, we are confident that the U-M is in a strong position to prepare the next generation of health care professionals, advance medical technology, attract and serve patients, and improve the health of our communities," concludes Omenn.

###



[ Back to EurekAlert! ] [ | E-mail | Share Share ]

 


AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.