[ Back to EurekAlert! ] Public release date: 28-Jul-2002
[ | E-mail | Share Share ]

Contact: Donna Krupa
djkrupa1@aol.com
407-685-4215
American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Secondary factors, such as early disease stage, alter laboratory findings for the elderly

Laboratory values for aging Americans should be compared against those of younger adults

Orlando, FL – Something curious has been happening in clinical laboratories. The findings for the elderly have differed creating a new benchmark of acceptable status of health. Yet accommodations for aging may be detrimental, even dangerous, in efforts to assess the health status of those growing older.

For years, those who conduct research to better the human condition have noted that some laboratory test results vary as a person ages. How do these variations affect the patient? Are these variations tied only to the age of the patient, or are there secondary factors? And how significant are these secondary factors?

Joseph Knight, MD. Professor of Pathology and head of the Division of Education, Department of Pathology at the University of Utah., and author of the book, Laboratory Medicine and the Aging Process (ASCP Press) has identified four major problems in interpreting laboratory data derived from elderly patients:

All these secondary factors are important to Dr. Knight’s assertion that aging and disease are not the same. Aging predisposes one to various diseases; for example, of the ten major causes of death in the United States, some 65-70 percent are lifestyle related (primarily obesity, physical inactivity, poor nutrition, smoking, and excessive alcohol intake).

Dr. Knight will present "Selected Topics in Laboratory Medicine and Aging," at the 54th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Clinical Chemistry (AACC). AACC (http://www.aacc.org/) is the scientific organization for clinical laboratory professionals, physicians, and research scientists. Their primary commitment is the understanding of laboratory testing to identify, monitor and treat human disease. More than 14,000 attendees are expected for the meeting, which is being held at the Orange County Convention Center, Orlando, FL, July 28-August 1, 2002.

His presentation will address the ideal reference values for so-called "healthy" elderly. Reference values are laboratory test values obtained from an individual or group (in this case, the elderly) in a defined state of health. This term replaces normal values, since it is based on a defined state of health rather than on apparent health.

Dr. Knight suggests that present laboratory values assigned to elderly to assess a state of health at a level associated with aging but later proved to be subclinical. Values measured include levels of cholesterol, thyroid-stimulating hormone, sodium, potassium, magnesium, selenium, zinc, albumin, blood urea nitrogen, and creatine, all important to the body’s key processes.

By adjusting reference values to those of a younger, healthier individual, Dr. Knight reviewed the literature of research and found that secondary factors in the laboratory resulted in:

Accordingly, disease, not evident by symptoms, is affecting the values accorded to the benchmark of mislabeled "healthy" elderly individuals. Dr. Knight recommends that ideal reference values for the elderly should be those found in young, health adults, where subclinical disease is not present. Doing so would assist in eliminating the elderly’s misplaced complacency about their health and possibly spur needed changes in lifestyle and screening programs.

Editor’s Note: To interview Dr. Knight, please contact Donna Krupa at 703.527.7357 (direct dial), 703.967.2751 (cell) or djkrupa1@aol.com. Or contact the AACC Newsroom at: 407.685.4215.


[ Back to EurekAlert! ] [ | E-mail | Share Share ]

 


AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.