A working group established by the Science Council arranged for the expert assessments of the individual projects to be carried out by several sub-panels. In addition to members of the Science Council, 53 external specialists, of which 36 came from abroad, were involved in producing the individual assessments. On the basis of the findings of each sub-panel, the Science Council has placed the proposals for each individual facility in the context of the national and international development of the research fields concerned and considered their overall importance in terms of science policy. As a result, the projects have been divided into three different categories:
The facilities in the first group, which, when implemented, will provide research infrastructures of a new quality, will contribute significantly to the development of the field of research concerned and are expected to lead to new scientific knowledge, are considered by the Science Council to merit unconditional support. Convincing scientific programmes and technical design reports have been presented for these projects. This first group includes the following facilities:
In the case of the second group of facilities, which, when implemented, will also provide research infrastructures of a new quality, there are certain questions which still require clarification. For this reason, the Science Council feels this group of facilities can be supported when certain conditions have been fulfilled. The Science Council requests the Federal Government to submit the project proposals again subsequent to revision in accordance with the requirements. This group includes the following facilities:
For the third group of facilities, the Science Council is submitting specific statements for various reasons. Should continuation of the work on the scientific programme and on the technical design report for these facilities lead to further knowledge and to a new project proposal, it will be necessary to carry out a new assessment. This group includes the following facilities:
The chairman of the Science Council, Professor Karl Max Einhäupl, stressed the special importance of the five proposed facilities which are considered to be worthy of support. "However," said Professor Einhäupl, "the cost of building the facilities (amounting to a total of Euro 4,9 billion) far surpasses all investments of this kind in Germany to date." Thus both the Federal Government and the Länder as well as the participating research organisations will be required to reorganise their funding programmes and structures. In addition, some of the facilities should be designed and financed as European or international facilities (see table in annex).
Einhäupl emphasised: "It will be crucial in the future, too, that the procurement of large-scale facilities is centrally coordinated and that suitable initiatives are assessed according to uniform scientific and research policy criteria. Financing facilities of this size is a continuous process. As a consequence, our statement of views forms the basis for further funding perspectives and decisions." On the basis of the statement and taking into account the subsequent scientific debate on the objectives and funding of the facilities, the Science Council will submit concrete recommendations in autumn 2002 with regard to the facilities whose implementation should be given priority. The Science Council offers to provide further advice in the future on questions relating to the funding of the favourably assessed facilities and also to assess new or revised proposals.
The Science Council advises the Federal Government and the Länder governments on questions concerning the structural and programme-related development of higher education institutions, science and the research sector and concerning the construction of new universities.
Annex
Projects for large-scale facilities assessed by the Science Council on behalf of the Federal Ministry of Education and Research
|
Investment costs (million Euro) |
Annual operating costs (million Euro) |
Construction period |
Funding model |
|
|
Group 1 High Field Laboratory High Altitude and |
24,5 97 |
3,7 3,8 |
4 years 3 years |
national national |
|
Group 2 TeV Superconducting Linear Accelerator (TESLA) TESLA X-ray Free Electron Laser (TESLA X-FEL) International Accelerator Facility for Beams of Ions and Antiprotons |
3.450 673,4[1] 675 |
135 36,1 79 |
8 years 8 years[2] 7 years |
international European European |
|
Group 3 Soft X-ray Free Electron Laser (Soft X-ray FEL) European Spallation Source (ESS) High Magnetic Field Facility for Neutron Scattering Research European Drilling Research Icebreaker (Aurora Borealis) |
148 1.387 48,5 250 |
€ 12,4 144 4,3 10-15 |
4 years 7 years 3 years 4 years |
national European national European |
[1] Additional costs for installation of the X-FEL facility. According to present plans, the X-FEL will use the first three kilometres of the TESLA linear accelerator.
[2] If built in combination with the TESLA linear accelerator.
NB: The statement on the facilities for basic scientific research (Drs. 5363/02) will be published on the Internet in unabridged form (www.wissenschaftsrat.de). Alternatively, it can be requested per e-mail from the Science Council Secretariat (sautmann@wissenschaftsrat.de).
Point of contact: Dr Uta Grund
Geschäftsstelle des Wissenschaftsrates, Brohler Straße 11, 50968 Köln
Tel: + 49 221/3776 - 246, Telefax: +49 221/38 84 40, e-mail: grund@wissenschaftsrat.de
AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.