Prior to 13 February, 202-326-6440
As of 13 February, 303-228-8301
American Association for the Advancement of Science
But, the editors and authors emphasized that the scholarly publishing community “must protect the integrity of the scientific process by publishing manuscripts of high quality, in sufficient detail to permit reproducibility.” Without independent verification of research results, they emphasized, “We can neither advance biomedical research nor provide the knowledge base for building strong biodefense systems.”
The joint statement, released at the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Annual Meeting and scheduled for publication in key journals next week, supports the concept of self-governance by the scientific community—an alternative to government review of forthcoming journal articles. The statement resulted from a 9-10 January workshop, sponsored by the National Academy of Sciences and the Center for Security and International Studies (CSIS) at the urging of the American Society of Microbiology, on policies for publishing potentially sensitive, peer-reviewed research.
Discoveries reported in research articles have helped to improve the human condition by protecting public health, improving agricultural yields, promoting technological advances and economic growth and enhancing global stability and security, the editorial group noted. But, long-standing concerns about the risk of “good” science falling into the wrong hands were brought into clear relief by the events of September 11, 2001.
What is potentially “dangerous” science? Risky research cannot be clearly defined or categorized, the editorial group said, but any work that might be used by terrorists for malevolent purposes should not be published. “How and by what processes [risky research] might be identified will continue to challenge us,” the editorial group concluded in its statement, which was presented at the AAAS Annual Meeting by Ronald Atlas, President of the American Society of Microbiology and Editor of CRC Critical Reviews in Microbiology. “It is also true that open publication brings benefits not only to public health but also in efforts to combat terrorism.”
The group further made four key statements, summarized as follows: The integrity of the scientific process, and reproducibility of results, are paramount; Editors in the group are committed to dealing responsibly and effectively with security issues; Scientists and journals should consider establishing processes for reviewing risky papers; and If potential risks outweigh benefits, editors should modify articles or decline to publish them.
The editorial statement will be published 18 February in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS); 20 February in the journal, Nature; and 21 February in the journal, Science. In an accompanying editorial, Science Editor Donald Kennedy noted that the tension between scientific publication and security is not new: “It emerged in a very problematic way in the early 1980s, when regulations designed to prevent the transfer of weapons specifications were suddenly applied to basic research,” prompting a report on “dual-use technologies,” he wrote. Novelist C.P. Snow’s exploration of the proverbial “Two Cultures” problem, which he applied to the cultural gulf between the sciences and the humanities, has now emerged in a different form, Kennedy said, as a chasm between the scientific and the security communities. The two cultures now must come together for the greater good, he added.
Attendees at the 9-10 January NAS workshop that resulted in today’s statement included:
Ronald Atlas, President, ASM, and Editor, CRC Critical Reviews in Microbiology
Philip Campbell, Editor, Nature
Nicholas R. Cozzarelli, Editor, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Greg Curfman, Deputy Editor, New England Journal of Medicine
Lynn Enquist, Editor, Journal of Virology
Gerald Fink, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Annette Flanagin, Managing Senior Editor, Journal of the American Medical Association, and President, Council of Science Editors
Jacqueline Fletcher, President, American Phytopathological Society
Elizabeth George, Program Manager, National Nuclear Security Administration, Department of Energy
Gordon Hammes, Editor, Biochemistry
David Heyman, Senior Fellow and Director of Science and Security Initiatives, Center for Strategic and International Studies
Thomas Inglesby, Editor, Biosecurity and Bioterrorism
Samuel Kaplan, Chair, ASM Publications Board
Donald Kennedy, Editor, Science
Judith Krug, Director, Office for Intellectual Freedom, American Library Association
Rachel Levinson, Assistant Director for Life Sciences, Office of Science and Technology Policy
Emilie Marcus, Editor, Neuron
Henry Metzger, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health
Stephen S. Morse, Columbia University
Alison O'Brien, Editor, Infection and Immunity
Andrew Onderdonk, Editor, Journal of Clinical Microbiology
George Poste, Chief Executive Officer, Health Technology Networks
Beatrice Renault, Editor, Nature Medicine
Robert Rich, Editor, Journal of Immunology
Ariella Rosengard, University of Pennsylvania
Steven Salzburg, The Institute for Genome Research
Mary Scanlan, Director, Publishing Operations, American Chemical Society
Thomas Shenk, President-Elect, ASM, and Past Editor, Journal of Virology
Herbert Tabor, Editor, Journal of Biological Chemistry
Harold Varmus, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
Eckard Wimmer, State University of New York at Stony Brook
Keith Yamamoto, Editor, Molecular Biology of the Cell
Advance interviews possible upon request.
OSTP COMMENT: Reporters seeking comment on this statement from John H. Marburger III, science advisor to U.S. President George W. Bush within the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) may call Kathryn Harrington at (202) 456-6124.
MEDIA NOTE: A newsbriefing on this statement and other information related to “Good Science in Bad Hands” will take place at 10:00 a.m. Mountain Time, Saturday, 15 February, during the AAAS Annual Meeting in Denver, in Rooms C-110-112, Colorado Convention Center. In addition to Ronald Atlas, other speakers at the AAAS newsbriefing will be Gigi Kwik of the Center for Civilian Biodefense Strategies; consultant Christopher Davis of the National Academy of Sciences Working Group on Biological Weapons; and John Steinbruner of the University of Maryland. (Note—Access to newsbriefings is restricted, for press registrants only. Press registration for credentialed reporters is located in the AAAS Press Center in Room C-101 of the Colorado Convention Center.) These and other speakers also will take part in a symposium, open to all AAAS Annual Meeting registrants, titled, “Biosecurity: Science in the Balance,” at 2:30 p.m. Saturday, 15 February.
The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) is the world's largest general scientific society, and publisher of the journal, Science (www.sciencemag.org). AAAS was founded in 1848, and serves some 265 affiliated societies and academies of science, serving 10 million individuals. Science has the largest paid circulation of any peer-reviewed general science journal in the world, with an estimated total readership of one million. The non-profit AAAS (www.aaas.org) is open to all and fulfills its mission to "advance science and serve society" through initiatives in science policy; international programs; science education; and more. For the latest research news, log onto EurekAlert!, www.eurekalert.org, the premier science-news Web site, a service of AAAS.
AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.