Early results indicate that the black hole weighs in at less than a million times the mass of our sun -– which would make it as much as 100 times smaller than others of its type.
To get their measurement, astronomers used NASA's Hubble Space Telescope and a technique similar to Doppler radar -- the method that meteorologists use to track weather systems.
The black hole lies 14 million light-years away, in the center of the galaxy NGC 4395. One light-year is the distance light travels in one year -- approximately six trillion miles.
Astronomers consider NGC 4395 to be an "active galaxy," one with a very bright center, or nucleus. Current theory holds that black holes may literally be consuming active galactic nuclei (AGNs). Black holes in AGNs are supposed to be very massive.
NGC 4395 appears to be special, because the black hole in the center of the galaxy is much smaller than those found in other active galaxies, explained Ari Laor, professor of astronomy at the Technion, in Haifa, Israel, and Brad Peterson, professor of astronomy at Ohio State.
While astronomers have found much evidence of black holes that are larger than a million solar masses or smaller than a few tens of solar masses, they haven't found as many midsize black holes -- ones on the scale of hundreds or thousands of solar masses.
Black holes such as the one in NGC 4395 provide a step in closing that gap.
Laor and Peterson and their colleagues used the Doppler radar-like technique to track the movement of gas around the center of NGC 4395. Whereas radar bounces a radio frequency signal off of an object, the astronomers observed light signals that naturally emanated from the center of the galaxy, and timed how long those signals took to reach the orbiting gas.
The method is called reverberation mapping, and Peterson's team is among a small number of groups who are developing it as a reliable means of measuring black hole masses. The method works because gas orbits faster around massive black holes than it does around smaller ones.
Peterson reported the early results Saturday at the meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Washington, DC.
Two of the team members -- Luis Ho of the Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington, and Alex Fillippenko of the University of California, Berkeley -- were the first to suspect that the black hole mass was very small. Filippenko and Wallace L.W. Sargent of the California Institute of Technology first discovered the black hole in 1989.
This is the first time astronomers have been able to measure the mass of the black hole in NGC 4395, and confirm that it is indeed smaller than others of its kind.
Peterson and Laor emphasized that the results are very preliminary, but the black hole seems to be at least a hundred times smaller than any other black hole ever detected inside an AGN.
The astronomers want to refine that estimate before they address the next most logical question: why is the black hole so small?
"Is it the runt of the litter, or did it just happen to form under special circumstances? We don't know yet," Peterson said.
NGC 4395 doesn't appear to have a dense spherical nucleus, called a galactic bulge, at its center; it could be that the black hole "ate" all the stars in the bulge, and doesn't have any more food within reach. That would keep the black hole from growing.
Team members are most interested in what the black hole measurement can tell astronomers about AGNs in general. Any new information could help astronomers better understand the role that black holes play in making galaxies like our own form and evolve. To that end, the team is also studying related data from NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory and ground-based telescopes.
"It's these extreme types of objects that really allow you to test your theories," Peterson said.
Contact: Brad Peterson, 614-292-7886; Peterson.firstname.lastname@example.org
Written by Pam Frost Gorder, 614-292-9475; Gorder.email@example.com
[Embargoed for release until 8:00 AM ET, Saturday, February 19, 2005, to coincide with presentation at the meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Washington, DC.]
AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.