The study looked at people taking two popular painkillers--rofecoxib (Vioxx, Merck) and celecoxib (Celebrex, Pfizer)--known as COX-2 inhibitors. During the past two years, evidence has emerged that COX-2s confer a risk of heart attack and stroke, resulting in two of the drugs in this class being withdrawn from the market and a black box warning being issued for a third drug.
"The use of any drug involves a mix of benefits and risks. The problems with COX-2 inhibitors were real, but involved less than 2 percent of patients who were taking them," said Garret A. FitzGerald, MD, study author from the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine. "Because we often underestimate just how much people differ in their response to the same dose of the same drug, there is a need to develop diagnostic methods to identify those patients at an increased risk of cardiovascular events and explore this variability in drug response to move toward an individualized approach in drug development."
Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania examined the variability, both within and between subjects, in response to celecoxib and rofecoxib, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study. Screening, enrollment and follow-up of healthy study volunteers was performed between January 2002 and January 2004. The study was conducted on 50 healthy volunteers between the ages of 21 and 43 years old who received a single dose of placebo, celecoxib and rofecoxib in random order. This was done to allow researchers a direct comparison of the responses to the drugs within the same subjects. Five of the patients went through the entire protocol five times to assess variability within individuals.
According to study authors, different factors in the environment result in a variety of responses from an individual who is dosed with the same drug at different times. This effect is seen even when as many variables as possible are standardized or controlled for. Approximately 30 percent of the variability found in patients was attributable to differences between individuals, suggesting the contribution of genetics to a variety of biomarkers of drug response. The study also illustrates that even healthy individuals without a recognized risk of disease respond quite differently to the drugs.
Previous studies have shown that rofecoxib and celecoxib result in a small number of the people who were apparently at a low-risk of cardiovascular disease initially, proceeding to increase that risk to the point that culminates in heart attack and stroke following prolonged use of these drugs. According to researchers, exploiting this variability could permit management of the cardiovascular risk of COX-2 inhibitors, while preserving their efficacy for patients most likely to benefit from them and determining how these drugs might be administered to people initially at low risk for cardiovascular disease.
"Typically when a drug causes hazardous side effects, the reaction is to suggest that people reduce the dosage they are taking. However, this has often been followed by withdrawal of the drug from the market when the problems are not eliminated," said FitzGerald. "These findings highlight that while a lower dose may reduce the likelihood of problems on average, it will not eliminate them on an individual level because there is such a marked variability in how each person reacts to these drugs based on their genetic make-up."
Study authors are hopeful that this work will provide an impetus for the development of a science-based approach to risk management. Exploitation of variability in response can lead to tests which identify patients most likely to benefit or suffer from harmful side effects caused by these drugs. "This study provides a starting point for the development of diagnostics that allow the medical and research communities to conserve benefits while managing the risks of COX-2 inhibitors," said FitzGerald.
This study was supported by grants from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, the National Center for Research Resources, the American Heart Association, the Wellcome Trust and Orchid Biosciences. Genotyping was performed at the Genomics Institute of Novartis Foundation.
More information is available at www.gastro.org.
About the AGA
The American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) is dedicated to the mission of advancing the science and practice of gastroenterology. Founded in 1897, the AGA is the oldest medical-specialty society in the United States. Comprised of two non-profit organizations--the AGA and the AGA Institute--our more than 14,500 members include physicians and scientists who research, diagnose and treat disorders of the gastrointestinal tract and liver. The AGA, a 501(c6) organization, administers all membership and public policy activities, while the AGA Institute, a 501(c3) organization, runs the organization's practice, research and educational programs. On a monthly basis, the AGA Institute publishes two highly respected journals, Gastroenterology and Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. The organization's annual meeting is Digestive Disease WeekŪ, which is held each May and is the largest international gathering of physicians, researchers and academics in the fields of gastroenterology, hepatology, endoscopy and gastrointestinal surgery.
Gastroenterology, the official journal of the AGA, is the most prominent journal in the subspecialty and is in the top one percent of indexed medical journals internationally. The journal publishes clinical and basic studies of all aspects of the digestive system, including the liver and pancreas, as well as nutrition. The journal is abstracted and indexed in Biological Abstracts, CABS, Chemical Abstracts, Current Contents, Excerpta Medica, Index Medicus, Nutrition Abstracts and Science Citation Index. For more information, visit www.gastrojournal.org.
AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.