I HANG my head and sink into my chair dejectedly. As I slouch, the computer monitor in front of me tilts forward and drops low to almost touch the desk, mimicking my gloomy posture. When I perk up and straighten my back, the computer spots the change and the monitor cheerfully swings forward and upward.
Meet RoCo, the world’s first expressive computer. Inhabiting a back room in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Media Lab, the robotic computer has a monitor for a head and a simple LCD screen for a face. It expresses itself using its double-jointed neck, which is equipped with actuators that shift the monitor up and down, tilt it forward and back and swivel it from side to side, rather like Pixar’s animated lamp. An attached camera can detect when its user moves, allowing RoCo to adjust its posture accordingly.
Unveiled at a human-robot interaction conference in Washington DC on 11 March, RoCo’s creators hope that by responding to a user’s changes in posture, people might be more likely to build up a “rapport” with the computer that will make sitting at a desk all day a little more enjoyable. The MIT researchers also believe that by tuning into users’ moods, the robot might help them get their work done more effectively.
The team is among a growing number of researchers who are investigating how far a robot’s physical presence can influence people. Harnessing technology to manipulate someone or shape their mood is nothing new. Researchers at Stanford University in California have shown that virtual-reality characters are more likeable when they mimic our facial expressions (New Scientist, 11 June 2005, p 25), and that an in-car assistance system can make us drive more carefully if the voice matches our mood. But because robots share our physical space, they can have a greater impact. “If it can actually touch you, it is a lot more meaningful,” says Cynthia Breazeal of the Media Lab, who created RoCo with her colleague Rosalind Picard. “Robots can engage us like never before. They can really push our buttons,” she says.
This is becoming increasingly relevant as robots enter our lives, in the form of robotic household cleaners such as iRobot’s Roomba and Scuba, for example, and personal companions like Paro the seal, developed by Japan’s Advanced Institute of Science and Technology.
Breazeal’s team has begun to explore how RoCo’s powers of expression might be harnessed. One aspect they are looking into is how the robot might affect our posture while working. Previous studies have shown that someone’s emotional state can dramatically affect their performance on analytical tasks and that posture can play a role in this. For example, one study showed that people who felt depressed were more persistent at carrying out a tracing task if they were able to slouch while they did it, while cheery souls tended to be more tenacious when they sat up straight – a response known as the “stoop to conquer” effect. “Emotion informs cognition, people whose emotion is inhibited don’t perform intelligently,” says Breazeal.
However, people don’t necessarily always sit in the “right” position for their mood. Enter RoCo. By taking up different positions, RoCo can encourage people to change their posture too. To investigate whether this would be useful in a working environment, the team gave two groups of people either a simple or unsolvable task to carry out. Once primed with a feeling of success or failure, the volunteers were given a new set of puzzles, projected onto RoCo’s screen. They found that the successful people who sat in front of an upward-tilting RoCo were more persistent in attempting to complete the second, unsolvable puzzle than those given a slouching RoCo. In contrast, those primed for failure by the previous task performed better when given a slouching RoCo than those given a neutral or upward-tilting one.
Breazeal suggests that RoCo could be programmed to adopt the right posture to foster greater attention and persistence in children, or simply to help improve people’s posture when sitting at a desk. In future the group also plans to investigate programming RoCo to mimic the posture and gestures of its users, just as it did with mine, to see if that builds rapport and enhances engagement with the computer, as such behaviour is known to do between humans.
Written by Celeste Biever, New Scientist reporter.
"This article is posted on this site to give advance access to other authorised media who may wish to report on this story, or quote extracts as part of fair dealing with this copyrighted material. Full attribution is required, and if reporting online a link to www.newscientist.com is also required. This story posted here is the EXACT text used in New Scientist magazine, therefore advance permission is required before any and every reproduction of each article in full. Please contact email@example.com. Please note that all material is copyright of Reed Business Information Limited and we reserve the right to take such action as we consider appropriate to protect such copyright."
THIS ARTICLE APPEARS IN NEW SCIENTIST MAGAZINE ISSUE: 24 MARCH 2007
EDITOR’S NOTE: PRIOR PERMISSION IS REQUIRED BEFORE ANY REPRODUCTION OF THIS STORY IN FULL
IF REPORTING ON THIS STORY, PLEASE MENTION NEW SCIENTIST AS THE SOURCE AND, IF REPORTING ONLINE, PLEASE CARRY A LINK TO: firstname.lastname@example.org
US CONTACT – New Scientist Boston office: Tel: +1 617 386 2190 or email email@example.com
AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.