[ Back to EurekAlert! ] Public release date: 15-Apr-2008
[ | E-mail Share Share ]

Contact: Carl Marziali
marziali@usc.edu
213-740-4751
Public Library of Science

Faint heart sometimes wins fair lady

The fittest males don’t always get the girl, USC biologists report. Study tackles a paradox in species from fruit flies to humans: If warriors win the spoils, why don’t males evolve towards super-aggressiveness?

There is more to mating than beating up the competition, according to a new study in PLoS ONE.

Female fruit flies sometimes choose males who win fights, sometimes choose males who do not fight, and sometimes choose males for no obvious reason, say biologists from the University of Southern California; Cal State University, Sacramento; and the University of California, Davis.

The findings help explain the large variation in aggressiveness in most species, including humans.

“If aggression makes you more likely to father children, all males should be selected to be very aggressive. Male fruit flies (like humans and other animals) show a lot of genetic variation in aggression, and we wanted to find out why,” explained study leader Brad Foley, a post-doctoral researcher at USC.

One reason for the variation, according to the study and to previous research on lizards by other groups, may be that no fighting strategy works all the time, just as in the game rock-scissors-paper.

“We showed in fruit flies that even the most genetically aggressive flies can have an Achilles heel, and lose against males who are (for the most part) wimps,” Foley wrote.

“There’s no single way to win a fight, or win mates,” he added. “Females didn’t necessarily prefer aggressive males -- some males mated less when they lost fights, but some males mated more if they didn’t fight. Moreover, different females preferred different males.”

“Unexpected interactions between individuals can define winners and losers (so-called ‘chemistry’),” Foley concluded. “In order to understand why flies, and humans, and other animals, are so genetically different from each other, we need to stop imagining there's a ‘best’ kind of strategy.”

So while Hamlet was described to have “the courtier’s, soldier’s, scholar’s, eye, tongue, sword,” it is not clear which part drove Ophelia mad.

###

The other member of the research team were Larry Cabral of Cal State Sacramento (co-corresponding author with Foley), and Foley’s supervisor Sergey Nuzhdin, professor of molecular and computational biology at USC. The paper was written at USC based on experiments conducted at the University of California, Davis, where Foley and Nuzhdin worked previously.

Funding for the study came from the National Science Foundation.

Contact:
Carl Marziali
Tel: +1 (213) 740-4751
Email: marziali@usc.edu

Citation: Cabral LG, Foley BR, Nuzhdin SV (2008) Does Sex Trade with Violence among Genotypes in Drosophila melanogaster?. PLoS ONE 3(4): e1986.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001986

PLEASE ADD THE LINK TO THE PUBLISHED ARTICLE IN ONLINE VERSIONS OF YOUR REPORT (URL live from April 15): http://www.plosone.org/doi/pone.0001986

PRESS-ONLY PREVIEW: http://www.plos.org/press/pone-03-04-foley.pdf

Disclaimer

The following press release refers to an upcoming article in PLoS ONE. The release has been provided by the article authors and/or their institutions. Any opinions expressed in this are the personal views of the contributors, and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of PLoS. PLoS expressly disclaims any and all warranties and liability in connection with the information found in the release and article and your use of such information.



[ Back to EurekAlert! ] [ | E-mail Share Share ]

 


AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.