Former patients believe that intensive care unit (ICU) follow-up services are important for their physical, emotional and psychological recovery. Research published in BioMed Central's open access journal Critical Care found that patients valued continuity of care after hospital discharge, information and reassurance from an expert familiar with their experience, and the opportunity to give feedback to ICU staff.
Suman Prinjha of the DIPEx Health Experiences Research Group, University of Oxford, interviewed patients about their ICU follow-up experiences. The work was supported by the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC). This study is unique because patients were gathered from many different ICUs. According to the authors, "We used a large sample size of patients from across the UK from different age groups, social and ethnic backgrounds, and reasons for ICU admission. The interviewer was also unconnected to the ICU service, making it easier for patients to speak openly about their experiences." Extracts from patients' interviews are also freely available at http://www.healthtalkonline.org/
Discharge from ICU can be a very stressful time and patients often have difficulty coming to terms with their experience. The provision of ICU follow-up services in the UK is inconsistent; surveys estimate that only 30% of ICUs offer a follow-up clinic. In this study, patients without access to ICU follow-up services felt abandoned and unsupported during their recovery period, as they didn't have the opportunity to be monitored or referred quickly if they had any problems. According to Suman, "This study highlights that patients value having ICU follow-up services but that their healthcare needs are often unmet because many hospitals do not provide this aftercare. Most patients were aware of the financial constraints on the health system and, while they valued ICU follow-up care, they did not want it to continue indefinitely, many of them declining appointment invitations when they themselves felt they no longer needed them."
Despite this, it remains uncertain whether ICU follow-up services change outcome and if they are cost effective in terms of clinical benefit. In the UK, as elsewhere, ICU follow-up care is relatively new and still evolving.
Notes to Editors:
1. What patients think about ICU follow-up services: a qualitative study
Suman Prinjha, Kate Field and Kathy Rowan
Critical Care (in press)
During the embargo, article available here: http://ccforum.com/imedia/4159382742136291_article.pdf?random=870565
After the embargo, article available at journal website: http://ccforum.com/
Please name the journal in any story you write. If you are writing for the web, please link to the article. All articles are available free of charge, according to BioMed Central's open access policy.
2. Critical Care is a high quality, peer-reviewed, international clinical medical journal. Critical Care aims to improve the care of critically ill patients by acquiring, discussing, distributing, and promoting evidence-based information relevant to intensivists. The journal is edited by Prof Jean-Louis Vincent (Belgium) and has an Impact Factor of 3.83
3. BioMed Central (http://www.biomedcentral.com/) is an STM (Science, Technology and Medicine) publisher that has pioneered the open access publishing model. All peer-reviewed research articles published by BioMed Central are made immediately and freely accessible online, and are licensed to allow redistribution and reuse. BioMed Central is part of Springer Science+Business Media, a leading global publisher in the STM sector.
AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.