[ Back to EurekAlert! ] Public release date: 12-Jun-2009
[ | E-mail Share Share ]

Contact: Rory Berrie
eularpressoffice@uk.cohnwolfe.com
44-789-438-6425
European League Against Rheumatism

Winter- and spring-onset RA patients have worse 6 month outcomes than those with summer onset

Copenhagen, Denmark, Friday 12 June 2009: When a patient's first symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) occur in winter, the severity of their RA (as measured by the modified Total Sharp Score, mTSS, an assessment of erosion and joint space narrowing) was rated more severe at six months, when compared to patients whose RA first became symptomatic in summer (Odds Ratio (OR) =2.82 [1.14;7], p=0.0255). Furthermore, RA patients with their first symptoms in spring showed poorer radiographic outcome compared to summer-onset patients (OR=2.83 [1.10;7.37], p=0.0322), according to the results of a new study presented today at EULAR 2009, the Annual Congress of the European League Against Rheumatism in Copenhagen, Denmark.

Similarly, patients' mTSS after six months was worse if their first symptoms had occurred in winter (OR=2.61 [1.20; 5.71], p=0.0158) or in spring (OR=2.63 [1.13; 6.14], p=0.0025) versus autumn as the reference season. This effect was not however observed at 12 month follow up, which the study authors suggest could suggest that these initial environmental factors exert less of an effect on longer term radiographic progression.

Dr Gal Mouterde, Immuno-Rheumatology Department, Lapeyronie Hospital, Montpellier, France who led the research, said: "During our study of predictors of radiographic progression, we have unveiled a distinct relationship between RA progression and seasonal onset and postulate that this could be as a result of either a vitamin D deficiency or environmental factors, such as winter viruses, influencing protein citrullination. Anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) are often found in the immune systems of RA patients. This finding may assist towards the identification of RA patients at a higher risk of developing structural damage, in order to propose early intensive therapy and minimise disease progression."

Of the 736 patients from the multicentre French ESPOIR cohort analysed in the study (4812 years of age, females 77%, mean disease duration 103+/-53 days, DAS28 5.111.31, HAQ score 0.970.68, CRP 21.932 mg/l, HLA-DRB1*01 or 04 57.5%), those found to have anti-CCP antibodies (total n=290) were also likely to have experienced increased radiographic disease progression (defined by an increase of at least 1 point of the mTSS), than those without anti-CCP antibodies, both after six months (OR=3.73 [2.04;6.82], p<0.0001) and one year (OR=5.38 [3.01;9.65], p<0.0001) compared to those without these antibodies.

Patients presenting with synovitis (inflammation of the membrane that lines the joints, commonly seen in rheumatic diseases) of at least 2 joints for a duration of 6 weeks to 6 months were assessed at baseline in terms of: clinical and biological features of arthritis (including radiographs of hands, wrists and feet), HLA-DRB1 gene typing, socioeconomic factors, comorbidities, IgM RF and anti-CCP auto-antibodies. They were re-assessed at both 6 months and one year.

The sensitivity and specificity of rheumatic factor (RF, an auto-antibody or antibody directed against an individual's own tissues sometimes seen in patients with RA) and anti-CCP at baseline in discriminating between erosive and non erosive disease at 6 months and one year were determined. Optimal cutoffs for these tests were derived from receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves using a cost function. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate the association between the radiological progression, and baseline variables.

###

For further information on this study, or to request an interview with the study lead, please do not hesitate to contact the EULAR congress press office on:
Email:eularpressoffice@uk.cohnwolfe.com
Rory Berrie: Onsite tel: +44 (0) 7894 386 425
Camilla Dormer: Onsite tel: +44 (0) 7876 190 439

Abstract number: FRI0115

About EULAR



[ Back to EurekAlert! ] [ | E-mail Share Share ]

 


AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.