[ Back to EurekAlert! ] Public release date: 3-Oct-2011
[ | E-mail Share Share ]

Contact: Beth Bukata
bethb@astro.org
703-839-7332
American Society for Radiation Oncology

Cancer patients in their 60s are tech-savvy

Prefer using Internet for quality of life survey

Miami Beach, Fla., October 3, 2011 When cancer patients are given the choice, they are significantly more likely to use Web-based technology to answer questions about their quality of life six months after treatment, compared to a paper survey, according to a unique study presented at a scientific session, October 5, 2011, at the 53rd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO).

This finding challenges the perception that older cancer patients do not have access to or are not comfortable using Web-based technology. Investigators found that a significant proportion of cancer patients averaging 64 years of age who participated in the study were computer-savvy and preferred using a keyboard to a pen or pencil to fill out a questionnaire.

"This Web-based survey is more convenient and less time-consuming for patients," Benjamin Movsas, MD, lead author for the study and chairman of radiation oncology at Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit, said. "It provides doctors with the data we need to share with our patients so they can make treatment choices that take into account quality of life issues."

Data related to quality of life issues is extremely important for patients with cancer; however, it has been challenging for doctors to receive consistent data about their patients' quality of life after treatment through the use of paper questionnaires.

The prospective study is part of a larger Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) randomized trial for early-stage prostate cancer patients that included a quality of life questionnaire. Findings showed that while 90 percent of patients completed the paper survey at the end of treatment, only 52 percent of patients did so six months after treatment. The most common reason cited for noncompliance was "institutional error."

Researchers wanted to find a new approach to increase participation in its quality of life questionnaire. The goal of the companion study was to determine if the compliance rate could increase from 52 to 75 percent using a Web-based system. Investigators used a HIPAA-secure Web-based technology, VisionTree Optimal Care, that can be accessed from any computer and offers email reminders to further increase compliance rates.

From September 2008 to December 2009, 49 prostate cancer patients who had an email address were involved in the study. Researchers found that the survey compliance rate six months after treatment increased from 52 to 90 percent (15 percent higher than their goal) when the Web-based technology was offered to patients.

The technology almost eliminated institutional error as a reason for noncompliance, since the Web-based system sent automatic email reminders to patients to encourage survey completion. A survey of research associates found that the system saved them an average of 10 minutes per quality of life form.

Movsas said, "We plan to use this new Web-based technology in studies for other cancer types, so we can better understand and ultimately improve the quality of life of additional cancer patients."

###

For more information on the ASTRO Annual Meeting, visit www.astro.org/annualmeeting. For more information on radiation therapy for cancer, visit www.rtanswers.org.

The abstract, "Electronic Web-based Technology Significantly Improves Quality of Life (QOL) Data Collection: Analysis of RTOG 0828," (abstract #221) will be presented at a scientific session at 10:45 a.m. on Wednesday, October 5, 2011. To speak to the lead author of the study, Benjamin Movsas, MD, please call Beth Bukata or Nicole Napoli, October 2 - 4, 2011, in the ASTRO Press Room at the Miami Beach Convention Center at 786-276-4506 or 786-276-4507. You may also email them at bethb@astro.org or nicolen@astro.org.



[ Back to EurekAlert! ] [ | E-mail Share Share ]

 


AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.