By deciphering the makeup of a bacterium found in the soil of a tropical rain forest, scientists may have a better understanding of how to more efficiently produce biofuels.
The production of liquid fuels derived from plant biomass offers a promising technology for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and dependence on fossil fuels.
While sugars stored within the plant cell wall, known as lignocellulose, are plentiful enough to supply most energy needs on the planet, their extraction is difficult and requires chemical pretreatment followed by enzymatic digestion using micro-organisms. However, while ionic liquids – salty solvents – improve the digestibility of lignocellulose, they also are toxic to bacteria used in subsequent conversion steps.
Using new experimental methods and computational analysis, a team of scientists from the Joint BioEnergy Institute (JBEI), led by Lawrence Livermore's Michael Thelen, discovered how certain bacteria can tolerate manmade toxic chemicals used in making biofuels.
"Discovering microbes naturally tolerant to salty liquids and understanding their mechanisms of tolerance should significantly enhance biofuel production," Thelen said.
The team describes an in-depth characterization of native bacterial resistance to the toxic effects of an ionic solvent used in biofuel production in the May 14 online edition of the journal, the Proceedings of the Natural Academy of Sciences (PNAS).
Microbes found in natural environments, such as decomposing forest soils, produce highly efficient enzymes to degrade lignocellulose and are often able to adapt to stressful changes in the environment. An alternative approach involves harnessing the positive traits of these native bacteria to engineer existing laboratory strains for more effective biofuel processing in the presence of toxic solvents.
Thelen and his colleagues isolated Enterobacter lignolyticus strain SCF1, a bacterium that can degrade lignocellulose from plant biomass. They found that SCF1 grows well in the presence of relatively high concentrations of an ionic liquid that is used for lignocellulose pretreatment. This chemical is highly toxic to other bacterial species.
"We looked into how SCF1 tolerates this ionic liquid by using high-throughput growth assays, composition analysis of the bacterial cell membrane, and by determining all of the genes that are differentially expressed when SCF1 cells are exposed to an ionic liquid," Thelen said.
By mapping these analyses onto all of the known metabolic reactions identified in the genome sequence of SCF1, the team found that the bacteria can resist the toxic effects of an ionic liquid by adjusting the composition of membranes to reduce cell permeability, and by increasing a type of transport protein that can pump the toxic chemical out of the cell before damage occurs.
"Vigorous efforts to discover and analyze micro-organisms with properties similar to those of SCF1 have the potential to greatly benefit industrial processes," Thelen said. "These results will be used as a foundation for genetic engineering of ionic liquid-tolerant microorganisms for a more efficient biofuel production process."
Other Livermore researchers include: Jane Khudyakov and Patrik D'haeseleer. Other institutions include: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Joint Genome Institute and Sandia National Laboratories. JBEI is one of three Bioenergy Research Centers established by the DOE Office of Science in 2007. It is a scientific partnership led by Lawrence Berkeley Lab and includes the Sandia National Laboratories, the University of California campuses of Berkeley and Davis, the Carnegie Institution for Science, and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
Founded in 1952, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (www.llnl.gov) provides solutions to our nation's most important national security challenges through innovative science, engineering and technology. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is managed by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration.
AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.