News Release

Cutting off all points of escape for melanoma cells

Research uncovers chokepoint in melanoma molecular escape pathway

Peer-Reviewed Publication

The Wistar Institute

Despite the success of recent approved therapeutics to treat advanced melanoma, metastatic cancer cells inevitably evolve resistance to drugs. In the journal Cell Reports, a team of researchers based at The Wistar Institute, report on the mechanics by which melanoma can evolve resistance to a powerful combination of drugs—BRAF and MEK inhibitors.

They found that resistant melanomas acquired a mutation in the MEK2 gene and multiple copies of the mutant BRAF oncogene, simultaneously decreasing the sensitivity to both drug targets. Their findings also uncovered a new potential target for melanoma therapy, a protein called S6K. Additionally, early studies in a laboratory model for melanoma show that a triple combination of drug inhibitors halted the growth of resistant tumors.

"Melanoma tumors are particularly adept at rewiring themselves so that anticancer drugs lose their effectiveness, and we must continue to outthink the disease in order to block off all points at which it can evade therapy," said Jessie Villanueva, Ph.D., assistant professor in Wistar's NCI-designated Cancer Center and member of The Wistar Institute Melanoma Research Center. "There are currently therapeutics available that can block the pathway that leads to S6K, but we are also interested in developing inhibitors to S6K itself."

Melanoma is the deadliest, most aggressive form of skin cancer. While surgical treatment of early-stage melanoma leads to 90 percent cure rates, advanced melanoma is notoriously resistant to chemotherapy and has a tendency to metastasize, or spread, throughout the body. According to the World Health Organization, cases of the disease continue to rise internationally, which has helped spur research into therapies such as BRAF and MEK inhibitors.

BRAF inhibitors were developed in response to discoveries that a specific mutation in the BRAF gene was responsible for nearly 50 percent of melanoma cases. The BRAF protein is part of the MAP kinase pathway, a chain of enzymatic reactions—including the enzyme MEK—that is commonly over-activated in cancers.

"Combining BRAF and MEK inhibitors was conceived as a one-two punch against the MAP kinase pathway," Villanueva said, "and while it is considered successful in the clinic, some tumors do not respond and others develop resistance, underscoring the need for new therapeutic strategies."

As cancer clinicians began to see patients develop resistance to BRAF and MEK inhibitors, the Wistar team began to explore the mechanisms by which tumors develop resistance. They found that melanoma cells used different tactics for each enzyme. Mutations in MEK2, for example, would render anti-MEK therapies ineffective. To defeat BRAF inhibitors, surviving melanoma cells exhibited numerous copies of the mutant BRAF gene, enough to overpower anti-BRAF drugs.

"There were simply too many copies of BRAF to block, it became a numbers game and the mutation was winning," Villanueva said. "Increasing the dosage of BRAF inhibitors could be one solution, but that cannot be done in patients without causing serious toxic effects."

A possible answer, they reasoned, was in the PI3K/mTOR pathway, a network of signaling enzymes often active within melanoma cells. However, they could find no sign that any of the "usual suspects"—points along the pathway commonly known to be involved in cancers—had any evident part in BRAF/MEK resistance. It was not until they examined farther "downstream" that they found persistent activation of S6K, an enzyme that appears to be at the point where P13K/mTOR and MAP kinase pathways merge.

So the researchers tried combinations of inhibitors against BRAF, MEK and PI3K/mTOR (as there are currently no effective S6K inhibitors) in a mouse model of melanoma. "With a triple combination of drugs, the tumors slow down and just stop growing," Villanueva explained.

Although a cocktail of two drugs (a combination of BRAF and PI3K/mTOR inhibitors, for example) might work, they postulated that using three drugs could be more potent and counter intuitively less toxic at the same time. "We followed these mice with melanoma for three weeks, tumors remain stable, and mice did not show any evident signs of toxicity, " Villanueva said

"For patients, it is not a simple matter of introducing triple combination therapies into use," Villanueva said, " but now we have a mechanism and a rational approach to develop both new drugs and more effective combinations aimed at solving drug resistance in melanoma. Our findings might also offer important lessons for other forms of metastatic cancer."

###

Wistar collaborators include Clemens Krepler, M.D., Patricia Reyes-Uribe, Minu Samanta, Hsin-Yi Chen, Ph.D., Rolf K. Swoboda, Ph.D., Adina Vultur, Ph.D., Mizuho Fukunaba-Kalabis, M.D., Ph.D., Thomas Y. Chen,, Qin Liu, M.D., Ph.D., Ronen Marmorstein, Ph.D., David C. Schultz, Ph.D., David W. Speicher, Ph.D., and Meenhard Herlyn, D.V.M., D.Sc. Co-authors also include Jeffrey R. Infante, M.D. from the Sarah Cannon Research Institute; Bin Li, Ph.D., Bradley Wubbenhorst, Giorgios Karakousis, M.D., Wei Xu, M.D., Ravi K. Amaravadi, M.D., Xiaowei Xu, M.D., Ph.D., Lynn M. Schuchter, M.D., Melissa Wilson, M.D., Ph.D., and Katherine Nathanson, M.D., from the University of Pennsylvania, and Douglas J. DeMarini, Ph.D., Anne-Marie Martin, Ph.D., and Tona M. Gilmer, Ph.D., from GlaxoSmithKline.

These studies were funded by grants from the National Cancer Institute (PO1 CA114046, CA093372, P30 CA010815), the CURE Program of the Pennsylvania Department of Health, The V Foundation for Cancer Research, Dr. Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Medical Research Foundation, and research funds from GlaxoSmithKline.


Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.