New Haven, Conn.— A Yale-led research team has developed a new approach to species conservation that prioritizes genetic and geographic rarity and applied it to all 9,993 known bird species.
"To date, conservation has emphasized the number of species, treating all species as equal," said Walter Jetz, the Yale evolutionary biologist who is lead author of a paper published April 10 in Current Biology. "But not all species are equal in their genetic or geographic rarity. We provide a framework for how such species information could be used for prioritizing conservation."
Worldwide, nearly 600 species of birds are currently in danger of becoming extinct as the result of human development pressures and environmental changes. Conserving genetically distinct and threatened species is especially challenging, Jetz said, because many of these are far from species-rich areas that are already being protected
Jetz and his team confront this problem by applying a criterion called evolutionary distinctiveness, a quantitative measure of genetic or evolutionary uniqueness. This metric helps conservationists prioritize which birds most deserve attention.
Birds that evolved earlier in history or that do not have close living relatives — such as the Oilbird, which has almost 80 million years of evolutionary history unique to it — have a high evolutionary distinctiveness. Birds that have evolved more recently or have many common relatives have a low evolutionary distinctiveness.
The researchers mapped the geographic ranges of all 9,993 species of living birds and applied evolutionary distinctiveness ratings to them. The results revealed areas where maximum conservation of bird diversity can be achieved with minimal investment, according to researchers. Among the targeted areas for future conservation are regions of Australia, Indonesia, Brazil, and Madagascar.
Conversationalists are already taking notice of the new approach.
The Zoological Society of London's (ZSL) EDGE of existence program focuses on conservation of evolutionarily unique species, such as those identified in the paper. The new quantitative methods for identifying unique species at risk have provided the EDGE of existence program a stronger framework for its fundraising and avian conservation efforts, according to Jetz and co-author Arne Mooers from Simon Fraser University, who have worked closely with ZSL for the last five years.
Mapping avian conservation has been an ongoing project for Jetz, who is leading The Map of Life Project (mol.org). The project integrates up-to-date information about species distributions and provides range maps for evolutionarily distinct species.
"In addition to targeted conservation, better monitoring of species' changing distributions is vital, and geographical conservation priorities can be effectively adjusted to better conserve the tree of life and the many important functions it provides," he said.
While Jetz's research group at Yale aims to expand this work to other vertebrates, he hopes that other scientists follow his lead to combine quantitative genetic and geographic information for maximally effective and minimally expensive conservation of the world's animals or plants.
"It is a reality that society is unwilling or unable to protect every single species into the future, so it would make sense to identify and potentially prioritize the most irreplaceable species over others," he said.
To explore the results go to http://www.mol.org/projects/ED or http://www.birdtree.org
Jetz is associate professor of ecology & evolutionary biology and associate professor at the Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies.
Other authors of this paper are Gavin H. Thomas, Sheffield University, U.K.; Jeffrey B. Joy & Arne O. Mooers, Simon Fraser University, Canada; David W. Redding, University College London, U.K.; and Klaas Hartmann, University of Tasmania, Australia.
The research was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the Natural Environmental Research Council, the National Science Foundation, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.