[ Back to EurekAlert! ]

PUBLIC RELEASE DATE:
5-May-2014

[ | E-mail ] Share Share

Contact: John Cramer
John.Cramer@Dartmouth.edu
603-646-9130
Dartmouth College
www.twitter.com/dartmouth

Tracking turtles through time, Dartmouth-led study may resolve evolutionary debate

IMAGE: This is a painted turtle.

Click here for more information.

Turtles are more closely related to birds and crocodilians than to lizards and snakes, according to a study from Dartmouth, Yale and other institutions that examines one of the most contentious questions in evolutionary biology.

The findings appear in the journal Evolution & Development. A PDF of the study is available on request.

The research team looked at how the major groups of living reptiles, which number more than 20,000 species, are interrelated. The relationships of some reptile groups are well understood -- birds are most closely related to crocodilians among living reptiles, while snakes, lizards and New Zealand's tuatara form a natural group. But the question of how turtles fit into this evolutionary picture has remained unclear. Are turtles more closely related to archosaurs (birds and crocodilians) or to lepidosaurs (lizards, snakes and tuatara)? Or are these other reptiles more closely related to each other than to turtles?

A growing number of studies examining DNA sequences have suggested a close evolutionary kinship between turtles and archosaurs, but those results were contradicted by anatomical studies and a recent study of small biomolecules called microRNAs. Because microRNAs are viewed by some as excellent evolutionary markers, the conflict between the microRNA and DNA results meant the turtle-archosaur link was viewed skeptically by many.

But the Dartmouth-led team's research suggests the earlier microRNA conclusions were erroneous, and instead indicates that microRNAs and DNA sequences yield a common signal -- that turtles share a more recent common ancestor with birds and crocodilians than with lizards and snakes.

###

The study included researchers from Dartmouth, Yale, the Smithsonian Institution, Mount Desert Island Biological Research Station and University of Bristol. Support came from the Yale Peabody Museum, Government of Alberta, Canadian Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council and NASA.

Available to comment are senior author Dartmouth Professor Kevin Peterson at Kevin.J.Peterson@dartmouth.edu and lead author Daniel Field, a Yale graduate student and a predoctoral fellow at the Smithsonian Institution's National Museum of Natural History, at daniel.field@yale.edu

Broadcast studios: Dartmouth has TV and radio studios available for interviews. For more information, visit: http://www.dartmouth.edu/~opa/radio-tv-studios/



[ Back to EurekAlert! ] [ | E-mail Share Share ]

 


AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.