response of suspected PPO-inhibitor–resistant [A92 (R)] and known susceptible [A66 (S)] waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) populations from Wisconsin (IMAGE)

Cambridge University Press

response of suspected PPO-inhibitor–resistant [A92 (R)] and known susceptible [A66 (S)] waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) populations from Wisconsin

Caption

This image shows the response of suspected PPO-inhibitor–resistant [A92 (R)] and known susceptible [A66 (S)] waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) populations from Wisconsin, 28 days after treatment with soil-applied sulfentrazone (Spartan), fomesafen (Flexstar), and flumioxazin (Valor) at 0×, 0.125×, 0.25×, 0.5×, 1×, 2×, 4×, and 8× the labeled rate. NTC = non-treated control.

Credit

Dr. Felipe de Andrade Faleco, former Ph.D. student, University of Wisconsin–Madison.

Usage Restrictions

n/a

License

Original content

Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.