News Release

Age and sex-related changes leave female flies vulnerable to delayed harm from head injury

A study establishes a causal relationship between early head trauma and neurodegeneration later in life, and shows how females are disproportionately affected in their response to injury

Peer-Reviewed Publication

eLife

A research team at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, US has discovered that even very mild, non-lethal head injuries early in life can lead to neurodegenerative conditions later in life upon ageing. 

Using fruit flies as a model, the researchers found that chronic immune suppression after mating might make female fruit flies susceptible to delayed brain deterioration following early-life head injuries.

The study, published today as a Reviewed Preprint in eLife, is described by the editors as fundamental work that advances our understanding of how sex-dependent responses to traumatic brain injury occurs. It provides what they call compelling results showing the immune and reproductive pathways that may contribute to these differences.

Environmental insults, including mild head trauma, significantly increase the risk of neurodegeneration later in life. However, identifying a causative connection between early-life exposure to mild head trauma and late-life emergence of neurodegeneration is challenging, and it remains unclear as to how sex and age compound the outcomes.

“With their short lives, fruit flies allow scientists to track brain-injury-related changes across their entire lifespan,” says lead author Changtian Ye, a graduate student in the Emory Neuroscience Program, and a member of senior author James Zheng’s lab, at the Emory University School of Medicine. “We recently developed a fruit fly model of mild traumatic brain injury that allows us to deliver mild headfirst impacts and then track what happens in male and female flies from the moment of injury to the occurrence of brain impairments later in life.”

Using their model, Ye and colleagues monitored the impact of mild traumatic brain injury on the flies’ behaviour. Whilst injury initially caused minimal acute deficits in the flies, it led to more profound brain-associated behavioural deficits and degeneration later in life, and these conditions worsened with age. Additionally, they were disproportionately elevated in females, affecting their climbing speed and ability, and leading them to have more damaged brain tissue than their male counterparts.

The researchers also found that female flies that had mated had worse outcomes than unmated (virgin) flies. They identified a protein called ‘sex peptide’ – which is transferred to the female reproductive tract through semen during mating – as a key player in making these flies more susceptible to the harmful effects of brain injury.

“Our analysis of the flies’ RNA data suggested that the chronic suppression of innate immune defence networks in mated females exposed to sex peptide makes them disproportionately vulnerable to neurodegeneration after mild head trauma,” Ye explains.

Together, the findings support the idea that a head injury can pose a major threat for brain health, even if it is mild, and that females can be disproportionately affected. The authors say that additional studies are now needed to determine if similar processes occur in other species.

“Our work establishes a causal relationship between early head trauma and late-life neurodegeneration, emphasising sex differences in injury response and the impact of age during and after  injury,” concludes senior author James Zheng, Principle Investigator at the Zheng Lab, Emory University School of Medicine. “It will be interesting to understand if this relationship occurs in other organisms, and to dissect the genetic components and molecular players involved in the sex-different development of neurodegenerative conditions following mild head trauma.”

##

Media contacts

Emily Packer, Media Relations Manager

eLife

e.packer@elifesciences.org

+44 (0)1223 855373

George Litchfield, Marketing and PR Assistant

eLife

g.litchfield@elifesciences.org

About eLife

eLife transforms research communication to create a future where a diverse, global community of scientists and researchers produces open and trusted results for the benefit of all. Independent, not-for-profit and supported by funders, we improve the way science is practised and shared. In support of our goal, we have launched a new publishing model that ends the accept/reject decision after peer review. Instead, papers invited for review will be published as a Reviewed Preprint that contains public peer reviews and an eLife assessment. We also continue to publish research that was accepted after peer review as part of our traditional process. eLife receives financial support and strategic guidance from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, the Max Planck Society and Wellcome. Learn more at https://elifesciences.org/about.

To read the latest Developmental Biology research published in eLife, visit https://elifesciences.org/subjects/developmental-biology.


Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.