News Release

Eyeing resources, India, China, Brazil, Japan, other countries want a voice on Arctic Council

International experts to recommend key issues as Canada prepares to assume Arctic Council chair

Peer-Reviewed Publication

Walter and Duncan Gordon Foundation

Tony Penikett, Munk-Gordon Arctic Security Program

image: This is former Yukon Premier Tony Penikett, Special Adviser to the Munk-Gordon Arctic Security Program. view more 

Credit: Tony Penikett

With an eye on rapid changes in the resource-rich Arctic, countries like China, India and Brazil, which have no Arctic territories, are nonetheless knocking on the door of the increasingly influential Arctic Council looking for admission as permanent observers.

The issue has divided existing members, with Russia and Canada most strongly opposed. It is among the major questions with which Canada will have to grapple as it prepares to chair the Council next year.

It will also feature prominently on the agenda of a two-day meeting on the future of the Arctic Council, January 17-18 in Toronto: The 2nd annual Munk-Gordon Arctic Security Conference, which has attracted the participation of several experts, national ambassadors and indigenous leaders -- more than 100 participants from 15 nations in all.

Full members of the Arctic Council are Canada, Russia, the United States, Norway, Finland, Sweden, Iceland and Denmark (Greenland) – the eight countries with Arctic territory. Six northern indigenous groups – the Inuit Circumpolar Council, Arctic Athabaska Council, Gwich'in Council International, Sami Council, Russian Association of the Indigenous Peoples of the North (RAIPON) and Aleut International Association – wield strong influence as permanent participants. The Arctic Council is the only international organization that gives indigenous peoples a formal place at the table. Another six non-Arctic nations sit in as observers today: the U.K., France, Germany, Spain, Poland and the Netherlands.

However, many more non-Arctic countries, which in addition to China, India and Brazil, include Japan, South Korea, the European Union and several individual European states, now want "observer" status, a step that some fear would significantly increase the influence of non-Arctic participants.

Many non-Arctic countries are interested in the Arctic as the "canary in the coal mine" that can teach them about how climate change will impact their own states. They are also interested in the potential access to the vast hydrocarbons and resources in the region and the cost-savings of using shorter Arctic shipping routes.

China has a research station in Norway's northern Svalbard Islands and is building an 8,000 tonne icebreaker.

A survey last year by the Munk-Gordon Arctic Security Program found that Arctic residents view China as the least attractive potential partner in the region.

Canada and Russia are the strongest opponents of expansion. Some fear a greatly enlarged contingent of observers would overwhelm the current members, particularly the indigenous groups. Others, however, warn that if the non-Arctic states aren't allowed at the table, they'll take Arctic concerns to other international bodies such as the United Nations General Assembly, and the Council's influence would diminish. On the other hand, membership fees charged to additional observers could help support the participation of the indigenous groups.

"The Council is struggling with this question," says Tony Penikett, Special Advisor to the Munk-Gordon Arctic Security Program and former Premier of the Yukon. "The non-Arctic states' interest is not just a fleeting fancy. For the Council to remain relevant, must it give them a larger role or remain an exclusive club?"

Another divisive issue: Should the Council, originally intended to make recommendations to member governments with a focus on environmental and sustainable development issues, expand its mandate to matters such as security, and aim to become a source of legally binding decisions? Scandinavian countries are the strongest supporters of such changes but others, particularly the United States, do not wish to see the Council enlarge its scope.

The forum in Toronto will recommend the issues Canada should pursue as Council chair.

Mr. Penikett says Canada has a great opportunity to become an influential Arctic power, and to ensure the resource-rich but fragile region doesn't become a "Wild West" where the views of long-standing residents are ignored.

The door to leadership opens wide in 2013 when Canada begins a two-year term as chair of the 16year-old Council, a governmental forum originally created to promote international co-operation in the North.

And it has proven its value, resolving territorial and other disputes. Council members, for example, have negotiated an agreement on search and rescue operations with another to deal with responses to oil spills under development. Boundary issues are being successfully managed under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.

As for the future, says University of Toronto historian John English, currently writing a history of the Council: "With rapidly growing global interest in Arctic resources, transportation and science, Canada will become Council chair at a strategic time. It has a golden opportunity to show leadership and shape the Arctic agenda."

"For Canada to be an Arctic leader and an Arctic power, we need to go beyond protecting our region through the purchase of jets, ships and satellites," says Madeleine Redfern, Mayor of Iqaluit, the capital of Canada's Arctic territory of Nunavut. "Canada needs to be a leader in science, research and development, governance and innovative solutions for our region. Despite our great challenges, including vast distances and climate, we also have immense opportunities in terms of resources and human potential. We northerners and Canadians all benefit from having strong, healthy and vibrant Arctic communities that contribute positively towards our nation's economy and security."

Tom Axworthy, President & CEO, Walter & Duncan Gordon Foundation, notes that, while counterpart entities in other Arctic states flourished, Canada has let its Canadian Polar Commission flounder. "While the Canadian Government has appointed a new board, adequate funding needs to follow these appointments for the Commission to be truly back in business," he says.

Entitled "The Arctic Council: Its place in the future of Arctic governance," the Toronto conference is a rare opportunity for representatives from all circumpolar states to meet policymakers and academics to examine the future of the Council and Canada's role within it.

A crucial question is how to ensure current structures are kept strong and effective enough to confront the pressures that will arise as the Arctic is opened to fossil-fuel and mineral exploration, international shipping, tourism and other developments.


The Arctic Council: Its place in the future of Arctic governance


Last year, the Walter and Gordon Duncan Foundation partnered with the Canada Centre for Global Security Studies at the University of Toronto's Munk School of Global Affairs to establish a four-year international Arctic Security Program to improve public policy in the circumpolar Arctic.

The Forum, January 17-18, will support the Arctic Security Program's next major project, developed jointly with the University of Lapland, to define the role of the Arctic Council and identify priorities moving forward as climate change focuses the world's attention more and more on the Far North. Conference outcomes will be detailed in an online publication this spring.

The conference will begin with a public session featuring original research contributions. Those with an interest in Arctic issues will share their views and add to the discussion on the future priorities of the Arctic Council.

The second day will be a closed session to provide an opportunity for senior decision-makers and policy-shapers to reflect on the recommendations put forth in the public session. It is expected that these discussions will result in concrete recommendations for Canada to take to the Arctic Council when it assumes the chair in 2013.

Confirmed participants include:


  • Tony Penikett, Special Advisor to the Munk-Gordon Arctic Security Program and former Premier of the Yukon


  • Anton Vasiliev, Ambassador at Large and senior Arctic official of the Russian Federation
  • Phillipe Zeller, Ambassador of France to Canada
  • Else Bert Eikeland, Ambassador of Norway to Canada
  • Erik Vilstrup Lorenzen, Ambassador of Denmark to Canada
  • Hannu Halinen, Ambassador in Charge of Arctic Issues, Finland
  • Marcos Gómez, Ambassador for Polar and Oceanic Affairs, Spain

International participants:

  • Martin Breum, Author and journalist (Denmark)
  • Lawson Brigham, Distinguished Professor, Geography & Arctic Policy, University of Alaska Fairbanks, and Senior Fellow, Institute of the North, Anchorage (USA)
  • Sanjay Chaturverdi, Professor, Political Science, Centre for the Study of Geopolitics, Department of Political Science; Honorary Director, Centre for the Study of Mid-West and Central Asia, Panjab University, Chandigarh (India)
  • Klaus Dodds, Professor, Geopolitics, Royal Holloway, University of London; Visiting Fellow, St Cross College, Oxford University (UK)
  • Piotr Graczyk, PhD Candidate, Faculty of Journalism and Political Science, University of Warsaw (Poland); Visiting Researcher at the University of Tromsø (Norway)
  • Morten Høglund, Conference of Parliamentarians of the Arctic Region (Norway)
  • Paula Kankaanpaa, Director, Arctic Centre, University of Lapland (Finland)
  • Timo Koivurova, Research Professor, Director of the Northern Institute for Environmental and Minority Law, Arctic Centre/University of Lapland (Finland)
  • E.J. Molenaar, Senior Research Associate, Netherlands Institute for the Law of the Sea (NILOS), Utrecht University, (Netherlands); Adjunct Professor, Faculty of Law, University of Tromsø, (Norway)
  • Annika E. Nilsson, Senior Research Fellow, Stockholm Environment Institute (Sweden)
  • Drue Pearce, Senior Policy Advisor, Crowell & Mooring; former Alaskan Senate President (USA)
  • Jennifer Rhemann, Council Co-Chair, Association of Early Career Polar Scientists (APECS); PhD Candidate, Polar Law Program, University of Akureyri (Iceland)
  • Nikolas Sellheim, Researcher, Northern Institute on Environmental and Minority Law (NIEM) at the Arctic Centre (Finland)
  • Andreas von Uexküll, Senior Arctic Official, Sweden
  • Steffen Weber, Secretary General, EU Arctic Forum; Expert Advisor, European Parliament, European Union

Canadian participants:

  • Thomas S. Axworthy, President & CEO, Walter & Duncan Gordon Foundation
  • Ryan Dean, Researcher, Munk-Gordon Arctic Security Program, Walter & Duncan Gordon Foundation
  • Cindy Dickson, Executive Director, Arctic Athabaskan Council
  • Kirt Ejesiak, Vice-President, Inuit Circumpolar Council
  • Sara French, Program Coordinator, Munk-Gordon Arctic Security Program, Walter & Duncan Gordon Foundation
  • Franklyn Griffiths, Professor Emeritus, Political Science, and George Ignatieff Chair Emeritus, Peace and Conflict Studies, University of Toronto
  • Anja Jeffrey, Director, Centre for the North, Conference Board of Canada
  • Whitney Lackenbauer, Chair, Department of History, St. Jerome's University (University of Waterloo)
  • John Lamb, Former Executive Director, Canadian Centre for Arms Control and Disarmament
  • Bridget Larocque, Executive Director, Gwich'in Council International
  • Natalia Loukacheva, Research Associate at the Munk School of Global Affairs, University of Toronto
  • James Manicolm, Professor, Asian Institute in the Munk School of Global Affairs, University of Toronto
  • Sheila Riordon, Senior Arctic Official, Ottawa

Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.