Public Release: 

Is legalising euthanasia premature?

Patients' voices are needed in debates on euthanasia BMJ Volume 327, pp 213-5

BMJ

Legalising euthanasia is premature when we still do not know why patients want it and whether better end of life care would change their views, argue researchers in this week's BMJ.

Euthanasia debates have focused on suffering, respect for patient autonomy, and dignified death, but little evidence is available from patients who desire euthanasia.

A few studies have shown that patients' reasons for wanting euthanasia are not confined to the physical effects of disease, but relate to their whole life experiences. However, more studies are urgently needed to capture their voices, say the authors.

Rather than focusing on assessing the mental competence of patients requesting euthanasia or determining clear legal guidelines, doctors must acquire the skills for providing good end of life care, they add. These include the ability to "connect" with patients, diagnose suffering, and understand patients' hidden agendas through in-depth exploration.

There is much to ponder over the meaning of a euthanasia request before we have to consider its justification. The desire for euthanasia must not be taken at face value, they conclude.

###

Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.