News Release

The link between funding and the disclosure of clinical trial results

Peer-Reviewed Publication

Canadian Medical Association Journal

There have been several conflicting reports in the medical literature about whether industry funding influences research findings and conclusions.

In this issue of CMAJ, Bhandari and colleagues state that their study of 332 randomized trials published between January 1999 and June 2001 shows that industry-funded trials were more likely to be associated with statistically significant pro-industry findings. They state this conclusion is not limited to trials of medical treatments -- it applies to trials of new surgical interventions as well.

In a related commentary, Laurence Hirsch, vice-president of medical communications at Merck Research Laboratories, argues that pharmaceutical companies can only undertake a finite number of trials, and consequently those considered more likely to yield positive results are given higher priority.

###

p. 477 Association between industry funding and statistically significant pro-industry findings in medical and surgical randomized trials -- M. Bhandari et al

p. 481 Randomized clinical trials: What gets published, and when? -- L. Hirsch


Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.