News Release

Robotic, fast fix as effective as full surgery for post-hysterectomy sagging vagina

Initial testing indicates promise for the procedure

Peer-Reviewed Publication

Mayo Clinic

ROCHESTER, Minn. -- An initial Mayo Clinic study has confirmed the effectiveness and durability over time of a patient-friendly, robot-assisted procedure that corrects a complication that can follow hysterectomy. The study, published in the February issue of Urology, is the first in the United States to examine the feasibility of using this method to repair vaginal vault prolapse, or collapsed vaginal walls.

"The benefit to the patient is dramatic," says Daniel Elliott, M.D., Mayo Clinic urologist and one of the lead study authors. "It's fast, markedly less painful and a strong repair, with much quicker recovery."

Mayo Clinic is the first medical center in the United States to offer this procedure, formally called "robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy." It pins back in place the top of a vagina that has fallen down within the vaginal canal or even outside the vaginal opening.

A drooping vaginal wall most commonly occurs when the top of the vagina falls in on itself as the pelvic floor muscles lose strength following a hysterectomy, which one in nine American women undergo. Following hysterectomy, up to 10 percent of women experience sagging of the vagina that requires surgical repair.

"The uterus acts like an anchor," says Dr. Elliott. "So, if the vagina loses its support, sometimes it inverts itself and comes out."

Signs of vaginal vault prolapse include: incontinence, pain during sexual intercourse, a feeling of fullness in the pelvic region, a sore back, or a lump drooping into the vaginal canal or even protruding outside of the body through the vaginal opening. Women who have this condition may find sitting, standing and walking uncomfortable.

In the traditional full, open surgery for vaginal vault prolapse, women have to undergo a four- to five-day stay in the hospital, a sizable abdominal incision and a recovery period of about six weeks, including abstinence from intercourse. In the new robotic procedure, however, the patient is kept in the hospital only overnight and has a much reduced recovery time, although she is still advised to abstain from intercourse for six weeks. Most importantly, the patients on whom the Mayo Clinic urologists performed the new repair have yet to have any problems with recurrence of the prolapse.

In the new robotic approach, the surgeon operates remotely from a computer terminal, guiding the robotic hand that performs the surgery, rather than standing over the patient. This technique also offers 3-D vision, better ability to maneuver and reduction of any tremor that might be present in the human hand.

As this study's aim was to test initial feasibility, it included the first five women to undergo the procedure at Mayo Clinic. Prior to the repair, two patients had grade three prolapse and three women were classified as grade four, the highest degree of prolapse.

Mayo Clinic urologists have now performed 18 robotic vaginal repair procedures, according to co-author George Chow, M.D., with equally successful or even superior results to those seen in the first five women.

# # #

For more information about this procedure, call the Mayo Clinic Urology Research Unit at 507-255-3986.

TECHNICAL INFORMATION -- Friday, Feb. 20, 2004

Eastern
Test 11:30-11:35 a.m. (EST)
Program: 11:35-Noon

Central
Test 10:30-10:35 a.m. (CST)
Program: 10:35-11:00

Satellite Coordinates -- Ku-Band
Satellite: Galaxy 11
Transponder: 12 (H)
Channel: 12
Downlink Frequency: 11942 MHz
Audio: 6.2 or 6.8 MHz
Longitude: 91° W

Satellite Coordinates -- C-Band
Satellite: Galaxy 4R
Transponder: 22 (V)
Channel: 22
Downlink Frequency: 4140 MHz
Audio: 6.2 or 6.8 MHz
Longitude: 99°

For News Release information, please contact: 507-284-5005 (Mayo Clinic Communications)
For satellite technical questions or difficulties, contact: 800-608-3663 (Strategic Television) or 507-284-9118 (Mayo Clinic Satellite Desk)


Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.