News Release

New studies regarding the efficacy of antioxidants and their impact on standard cancer treatment

Peer-Reviewed Publication

SAGE

Thousand Oaks, CA, USA November 12, 2004 – There is much debate in the medical community about whether antioxidants interfere with cancer treatment by providing tumor protection or whether they improve the efficacy of treatment by mitigating toxicity and side effects. The December 2004 issue of the journal Integrative Cancer Therapies, entitled "Antioxidants and Cancer Therapy", offers hard evidence on the potential value and risks of the use of antioxidants to improve the tolerability and efficacy of cancer treatment regimens.

Some of the intriguing findings from the research in this issue include:

  • The relationship of antioxidants and carcinogenesis, including the use of ß-carotene in cancer prevention and a discussion of its prooxidant activity (Homer S. Black).

  • The formation of aldehydes as the central concern of oxidant stress for cancer therapy and how to ameliorate such stress (Kenneth A. Conklin).

  • The first study that examines oxidative damage directly in the bone marrow of children with ALL (acute lymphoblastic leukemia) using (8-oxo-dG) as a biomarker for oxidative stress. One important result is the discovery that the levels of individual antioxidants vary according to disease status. (Deborah D. Kennedy, Regina M. Santella, Qiao Wang, Elena J. Ladas, and Kara M. Kelly).

  • Specific nutritional protocols for both active cancer treatment and maintenance protocols, including the unfavorable effects of non-prescribed vitamins and nutritional supplements taken during treatment and multi-vitamins with low dosages of antioxidants after the completion of therapy (Kedar N. Prasad).

  • Investigation of a potential radioprotective agent with little or no toxicity that was developed from the fruit of Aegle marmelos (AME) (Ganesh Chandra Jagetia, Ponemone Venkatesh and Manjeshwar Shrinath Baliga).

  • Compelling evidence that antioxidants do not interfere with chemotherapeutics and may actually protect normal cells from cytotoxic onslaught (Carmia Borek).

    A nontoxic agent that moderates treatment side effects without unduly protecting malignant tumors has much to offer oncology, including: 1) a lower need for dose reduction or treatment delay; 2) an improvement in quality of life for the cancer patient; 3) less oncology staff time spent dealing with side effects and patient complaints; 4) a lower need for pharmaceuticals; 5) fewer adverse reactions. (Keith I. Block)

    ###

    Visit http://ict.sagepub.com/content/vol3/issue4/ for free online access to this issue of Integrative Cancer Therapies, published by SAGE Publications.

    About the Journal

    Integrative Cancer Therapies focuses on evidence based and scientifically sound alternative, complementary, experimental, and traditional non-Western medical practices and their responsible integration into conventional health care. Edited by Dr. Keith Block, Medical and Scientific Director of the Institute for Integrative Cancer Care, Integrative Cancer Therapies spearheads a new and growing movement in cancer treatment--integrative care--patient-focused care that aims to improve health outcomes and quality of life.

    About SAGE Publications

    SAGE Publications is a leading international publisher of journals, books, and electronic media for academic, educational, and professional markets. Since 1965, SAGE has helped inform and educate a global community of scholars, practitioners, researchers, and students. SAGE Publications, a privately owned corporation, has principal offices in Thousand Oaks, California, and in London, United Kingdom. SAGE journals are available online via SAGE Journals Online at http://online.sagepub.com.


  • Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.