The research, reported in today's online version of the journal Cancer (http://www.
"Our results show that while safeguards such as computerized order-entry systems -- used at both Dana-Farber and Brigham and Women's -- significantly reduce drug-order errors, additional improvements are still possible, and necessary" says the study's co-lead author, Tejal Gandhi, MD, MPH, of Brigham and Women's.
Adds co-lead author Sylvia Bartel, RPh, MHP, of Dana-Farber, "DFCI's leadership supported the in-depth review of all medication orders to gain information about potential system defects. The goal was to utilize the results of the study to make system improvements and ensure a safe medication process for our patients."
Previous studies have estimated that about five percent of drug orders for hospitalized patients have errors, but much less scientific attention has been given to the prevalence of such mistakes in outpatient settings. While medication errors often don't harm patients, the complexity of some chemotherapy regimens, and the toxicity of the drugs, makes it particularly important to minimize mistakes in ordering and administering cancer therapies.
In the current study, Gandhi, Bartel, and their colleagues from BWH, Dana-Farber, and the Harvard School of Public Health reviewed more than 10,000 medication orders from Dana-Farber's adult and pediatric ambulatory oncology infusion clinics, which used a computerized or paper medication-ordering system, respectively. Using a strict definition of error, they found that three percent of the orders contained errors, one-third of which were deemed serious.
Rating the errors by severity, researchers determined that 82 percent of the errors in adults and 60 percent in children had potential for harm to patients. Pharmacists and nurses caught 45 percent of the potentially harmful errors before they reached patients, and none of the errors actually caused patient harm.
In the adult clinics, which used a computer-aided ordering system, and the pediatric clinic, where a paper-based ordering system was in place, the most frequent errors involved omitted or incorrect dosages and failure to discontinue orders.
To reduce the chances of future medication order errors, officials at DFCI have instituted several changes. In the pediatric clinic, orders are now placed via computer. In the adult clinics, physicians now use a more sophisticated computer application with more of the drug-ordering information embedded within it. For medications that are usually given in tandem, the program now requires physicians to order both at the same time.
Co-authors of the study are Lawrence Shulman, MD, Deborah Verrier, RN, Angela Cleary, RN, of Dana-Farber; Elisabeth Burdick, MS, Jeffrey Rothschild, MD, MPH, and David Bates, MD, MSc, of Brigham and Women's; and Lucian Leape, MD, of the Harvard School of Public Health.
The study was supported by a grant from the Harvard Risk Management Foundation.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute is a principal teaching affiliate of the Harvard Medical School and is among the leading cancer research and care centers in the United States. It is a founding member of the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center (DF/HCC), designated a comprehensive cancer center by the National Cancer Institute.
Brigham and Women's Hospital is a 755-bed non-profit teaching affiliate of Harvard Medical School and a founding member of the Partners HealthCare system, a integrated health-care delivery network. Internationally recognized as a leading academic health-care institution, BWH is committed to excellence in patient care, medical research, and the training and education of health-care professionals.