Chapel Hill, N.C. – May 12, 2008 – In light of the subprime mortgage crisis that has resulted in extraordinarily high default rates on home mortgages, one might wonder what the government can do to better educate new potential homeowners. A recently published article appearing in the Journal of Policy Analysis and Management found that borrowers who complete homeownership education and counseling (HEC) programs are more informed about when to make refinancing decisions. The effectiveness of education and counseling varies by the type of program.
Researchers surveyed low-income homeowners who purchased a home between 1999 and 2003. They then observed loan performance through the first quarter of 2006, a period of strong growth in home values and steady decreases in interest rates.
Homeowners had completed a variety of different types of homeownership education and counseling from multiple providers across the United States. The type and quality of these programs greatly varied, ranging from intensive classroom-based instruction with individualized attention, to telephone-based counseling, and home study.
Borrowers who completed the HEC programs were more responsive to the financial incentive to refinance than other borrowers. Specifically, borrowers who participated were more likely to refinance when they could lower their interest rates and by doing so, less likely to refinance during periods when it was not financially beneficial.
The study also found that the impact of education and counseling programs is specific to programs that include classroom-based instruction and/or individual counseling. Programs based on home study or telephone counseling did not show similar impacts.
“Our study offers evidence of the effectiveness of intensive, classroom-based HEC programs,” the authors conclude. “These findings reflect the educational value of HEC programs, which directly affect the economic benefits of homeownership for HEC participants.”
This study is published in the Spring 2008 issue of the Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. Media wishing to receive a PDF of this article may contact journalnews@bos.blackwellpublishing.net.
Roberto G. Quercia, PhD, is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and can be reached for questions at quercia@email.unc.edu.
The Journal of Policy Analysis and Management encompasses issues and practices in policy analysis and public management. Listed among the contributors are economists, public managers, and operations researchers. Featured regularly are book reviews and a department devoted to discussing ideas and issues of importance to practitioners, researchers, and academics.
Wiley-Blackwell was formed in February 2007 as a result of the acquisition of Blackwell Publishing Ltd. by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., and its merger with Wiley’s Scientific, Technical, and Medical business. Together, the companies have created a global publishing business with deep strength in every major academic and professional field. Wiley-Blackwell publishes approximately 1,400 scholarly peer-reviewed journals and an extensive collection of books with global appeal. For more information on Wiley-Blackwell, please visit www.blackwellpublishing.com or http://interscience.wiley.com.
Journal
Journal of Policy Analysis and Management