News Release

Gasoline stations set prices to match a small number of other stations

Peer-Reviewed Publication

Wiley

Quebec, Canada – July 30, 2008 – For many years, there have been competition concerns regarding how retail gasoline prices are set in the U.S. and Canada. Consumers have complained about the perceived uniformity of retail gas prices and the perception that retailers raise their prices at the same time. A new study in Economic Inquiry shows that to a large extent, gas stations do set prices to match a small number of other gas stations. However, these stations are not necessarily the closest in distance.

Benjamin Atkinson, Andrew Eckert, and Douglas S. West collected regular-grade gasoline prices every two hours over 103 days for 27 stations in Guelph, Ontario.

Results indicate, consistent with an informal theory of competitive gasoline pricing, that stations did tend to set prices to match a small number of other gas stations. The stations, however, were not necessarily the closest. Instead, price movements of stations within the same chain are often highly correlated, suggesting that certain stations' prices are only indirectly dependent on rival stations' prices.

Also, while some stations often respond to price changes of another station within two hours, many take considerably longer to respond.

In addition, while price decreases do ripple through the market like falling dominos, the order in which stations increase prices appears to be more strongly associated with the location and source of price control than with proximity to the leaders of these increases.

"Our results suggest that the stylized facts that the competitive theory was designed to explain are an oversimplification of how retail gasoline prices are actually set," the authors conclude. "Competition authorities should be hesitant to accept the competitive model of gasoline pricing without a full analysis of pricing in other retail gasoline markets."

###

This study is published in the June 2008 issue of Economic Inquiry. Media wishing to receive a PDF of this article may contact journalnews@bos.blackwellpublishing.net.

Benjamin Atkinson, Ph.D., is affiliated with the University of Alberta and can be reached for questions at bja@ualberta.ca.

Published since 1962, (formerly Western Economic Journal), EI is widely regarded as one of the top scholarly journals in its field. Besides containing research on all economics topic areas, a principal objective is to make each article understandable to economists who are not necessarily specialists in the article's topic area. Nine Nobel laureates are among EI's long list of prestigious authors.

Wiley-Blackwell was formed in February 2007 as a result of the acquisition of Blackwell Publishing Ltd. by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., and its merger with Wiley's Scientific, Technical, and Medical business. Together, the companies have created a global publishing business with deep strength in every major academic and professional field. Wiley-Blackwell publishes approximately 1,400 scholarly peer-reviewed journals and an extensive collection of books with global appeal. For more information on Wiley-Blackwell, please visit www.blackwellpublishing.com or http://interscience.wiley.com.


Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.