Tampa, FL – September 4, 2008 – Social psychology is the study of how people and groups interact. A new study in the journal International Studies Review shows how social psychology can help us better understand the puzzle of nuclear restraint and uses the case of Japan to illustrate social psychology on nuclear decision-making.
Maria Rost Rublee of the University of Tampa shows how social psychology's framework for how attitudes and behaviors change can be applied to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT), which was signed in 1968 to limit the spread of nuclear weapons.
Rublee argues that nuclear forbearance, or compliance with the NPT, is best understood as three different outcomes by social psychology literature: persuasion, identification and conformity. Persuasion is behavior resulting from genuine transformation of preferences, social conformity is behavior resulting from the desire to maximize social benefits, and identification is behavior resulting from the desire or habit of following the actions of an important other.
Japan 's forbearance can be seen as a result of identification. The Japanese have defined themselves in relationship to the United States , not just in defense matters, but politically, economically, and even socially. However, the most compelling reason for Japan 's choices to forgo nuclear weapons is persuasion, based on the larger issue of what it means to be a successful state.
Japan 's faith in the NPT is not because policymakers believe that it will definitely keep other states from pursuing nuclear option, but rather because it furthers the norm they believe in.
Social psychology has also found that the need to both appear and be consistent is a powerful motivator. Once Japan signed the NPT, the nuclear option was largely closed.
"To the extent that we can better understand the mechanisms that produce compliance across regime type and across issue area, the better able we will be to offer useful policy prescriptions to policymakers," Rublee notes.
This study is published in the September 2008 issue of the journal International Studies Review. Media wishing to receive a PDF of this article may contact journalnews@bos.blackwellpublishing.net.
Maria Rost Rublee is affiliated with the University of Tampa and can be reached for questions at mrublee@ut.edu.
The International Studies Review (ISR) provides a window on current trends and research in international studies worldwide. Published four times a year, ISR is intended to help: (a) scholars engage in the kind of dialogue and debate that will shape the field of international studies in the future, (b) graduate and undergraduate students understand major issues in international studies and identify promising opportunities for research, and (c) educators keep up with new ideas and research. To achieve these objectives, ISR includes analytical essays, reviews of new books, and a forum in each issue.
Wiley-Blackwell was formed in February 2007 as a result of the acquisition of Blackwell Publishing Ltd. by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., and its merger with Wiley's Scientific, Technical, and Medical business. Together, the companies have created a global publishing business with deep strength in every major academic and professional field. Wiley-Blackwell publishes approximately 1,400 scholarly peer-reviewed journals and an extensive collection of books with global appeal. For more information on Wiley-Blackwell, please visit www.blackwellpublishing.com or http://interscience.wiley.com.
Journal
International Studies Review