Scientists investigating the 2006 Northwick Park drug-trial disaster that left six healthy volunteers hospitalised say they have developed new pre-clinical tests that could have stopped the trial from ever going ahead.
But Dr Stephen Poole, speaking at the British Pharmacological Society's Winter Meeting in Brighton today (Tuesday), said that research is still "ongoing" to understand why the drug had such an adverse effect in the clinic but not in pre-clinical testing.
Describing the incident as "the most obvious setback for medicines testing since thalidomide", Dr Poole and his colleagues, from the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) have, with new tests, successfully reproduced the devastating reaction suffered by the volunteers using human cells in the test tube (in vitro).
Standard preclinical in vitro tests on TGN1412 - the immunotherapy drug responsible for the Northwick Park disaster - failed to predict the catastrophic reaction that would occur when TGN1412 was administered to human subjects.
TGN1412 is from a class of drugs developed to re-balance the immune system for the treatment of autoimmune diseases, where the immune system has started to attack the body, such as rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis.
The Northwick Park disaster resulted in the UK Medicine and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) suspending all clinical trials of immunotherapy drugs and commissioning NIBSC, a government-funded institute, to investigate why both in vitro human cell tests and in vivo animal tests failed to predict the human immune system's response to the drug.
"With hindsight testing this drug in man was a mistake, but at the time the standard required pre-clinical tests failed to predict the effects it would have on the six volunteers," said Dr Poole, who said that the NIBSC's group's second paper on TGN1412 was due to be published shortly.
"While we are still investigating why the effect of this drug was so catastrophically different in the clinic than in pre-clinical testing, we have at least managed to develop new pre-clinical tests that should help us to avoid such outcomes in the future."
Speaking at the British Pharmacological Society (BPS) conference, Dr Poole identifies new pre-clinical in vitro testing of immunotherapy drugs that should help prevent any repetition of the disastrous events that were witnessed at Northwick Park.
These measures include ensuring that such drugs are not tested solely on immune (white blood) cells in isolation. The NIBSC group has shown that having a mixed human cell culture of white blood cells and endothelial cells - the cells that line blood vessels - is a much better indicator of how this type of drug will react in vivo.
The NIBSC group has also developed a technique that dries the drug onto a plastic surface, rather than testing it on cells as a solution in water, which has proven to be a far more reliable indicator of how the drug will react in the human body.
"The aim of our research is to improve the preclinical testing of immunotherapy drugs on human cells in vitro, as well as to establish why the antibody was not toxic in pre-clinical testing," said Dr Poole.
"We have made significant progress in designing new in vitro tests that hopefully will avoid the consequences that occurred at Northwick Park; indeed such tests could prevent harmful drugs of this type even reaching the animal-testing stage."
Immunotherapy drugs have the potential to be incredibly important in the treatment of diseases that have so far eluded medical advances, including many forms of cancer, so it is vital that the scientific community has its faith in clinical trials and in immunotherapy fully restored.
Notes for editors:
About the Northwick Park trial
The Phase 1 clinical trial of TGN1412 took place at an independent clinical trials unit at Northwick Park and St Mark's Hospital, London, on 13 March 2006. TGN1412 was intended for the treatment of leukaemia, multiple sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis. Eight volunteers were given the drug or a placebo by intravenous infusion, with an interval of about 10 minutes between patients. Within minutes of the last patient being administered the drug, the first began to complain of headache, followed by fever and pain. The five other patients to receive TGN1412, as opposed to the placebo, became ill soon afterwards. All six male volunteers experienced cytokine release syndrome with effects similar to those of people suffering a severe allergic reaction. Each of the men was hospitalised for several weeks, with the worst affected requiring hospital treatment for four months.
About the NIBSC
The National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) is a government-funded institute providing independent testing of biological medicines for the UK market. NIBSC testing of products already released on to the EU market may also be carried out when particular problems arise, such as failure of storage conditions, or following adverse reactions in patients. NIBSC is managed by the National Biological Standards Board (NBSB), which is a non-departmental public body of the UK government, responsible for safeguarding and advancing public health by assuring the quality and safety of biologicals.
About the MHRA
The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) is the government agency responsible for ensuring that medicines and medical devices work, and are acceptably safe.
About the BPS
The British Pharmacological Society, including its Clinical Pharmacology Section, is the professional association for pharmacologists in the UK and is one of the leading pharmacological societies in the world.
The history of the Society dates back to 1931 when a group of pharmacologists met in Oxford and decided to form a learned society. Since those small beginnings the Society has grown to about 2,500 members, who work in academia, industry and the health services, and many are medically qualified. The Society covers the whole spectrum of pharmacology, including the laboratory, clinical and toxicological aspects.
The aims of the Society are to promote and advance pharmacology, including clinical pharmacology, by: assisting, promoting and encouraging research and providing a forum for the presentation of pharmacology; publishing the results of research; promoting and encouraging the education and training of pharmacologists; publishing material in various forms, and promoting and arranging conferences and meetings.
For further information about the British Pharmacological Society visit: http://www.
About the Winter Meeting
The BPS Winter Meeting will be held at the Hilton Brighton Metropole Hotel from Tuesday, 16 December, to Thursday, 18 December, 2008.
- Professor David Back (University of Liverpool): 'Optimising the management of patients with HIV infection' (16 Dec)
- Dr Andrew Kicman (Kings College London): 'Pharmacology in sports/Olympics' (17 Dec)
- Professor Arthur Weston (University of Manchester): Potassium channels and myo-endothelial crosstalk in blood vessels: a pharmacologist's view' (18 Dec)
- Kirk Leech / Corina Hadjiodysseos: 'Animal research: Winning the debate' (18 Dec)
For further information about the BPS Winter Meeting visit: http://www.