Public Release: 

Genetic testing seeks co-ordinated approach in re-contacting patients

University of Exeter

A new study will be examining the implications of when and how NHS healthcare professionals re-contact patients with new genetic information that may impact their health or that of their family. The three year Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) funded research will also explore issues of consent and how genetic information is stored.

Professor Susan Kelly from the University of Exeter is leading the project looking at how the NHS currently re-contacts patients; the legal context for this and the relevant guidelines; ethical issues, and expectations of both patients and professionals. The project involves partners from Cardiff University (Angus Clarke), the University of Southampton (Anneke Lucassen) and the Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital (Peter Turnpenny).

Professor Kelly explained: "The study will contribute to our understanding of implications of rapid innovation in genomics for patients, families and healthcare professionals. It will also provide evidence based recommendations regarding communication between healthcare professional and patients, potentially leading to the development of an ethical and professional framework regarding re-contacting patients."

She added: "The key questions we will be exploring are whether there is a professional duty or responsibility to re-contact patients for whom healthcare providers hold information deriving from genetic or genomic tests. These questions are pressing as these tests are used more widely in healthcare, by healthcare professionals outside clinical genetics, as genomics becomes 'mainstreamed'. We will be exploring professional and patient expectations concerning who, how and under what circumstances patients should be re-contacted in the light of new genetic information."

Genetic and genome testing is becoming increasingly relevant to specialist medical services outside of clinical genetics, as a means of using this new knowledge to influence peoples' health. For example, cardiologists, paediatrics and oncologists are ordering more tests as a result of the pace of innovation and improvements to genetic information available to them. The issue of re-contacting patients arises in relation to the development and improvement of diagnostic techniques, prognostic information, the availability of new or more refined genetic tests, or when new theories are developed.

The study will investigate the hypotheses that mainstreaming genomics in healthcare should be understood as a social as well as a technological process, and that professional subcultures across specialities will vary with regard to norms and expectations concerning re-contacting patients.

Clinical genetic services have developed practices around handling genetic information; as such knowledge is understood to raise familial, future disease risk and uncertainty concerns. The team of experts involved in the project hypothesise that there will be significant differences in how different medical specialties and healthcare providers handle the genetic information produced by such tests. It is not always clear who will inform patients of the results and potential impact of those results, or communicate new developments.

Professor Kelly explained: "Genetic services look at the patient and the family, rather than just the patient. Other healthcare providers have different professional styles and practices. GPs and consultants are used to seeing the patient in front of them and may deal directly with him or her as an individual. Genetic information may have implications for other family members and a wider range of healthcare providers will need to be familiar with these issues including when to re-contact someone in the light of new information."

###

Editors Notes:

1. The Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) funds research into the big social and economic questions facing us today. We also develop and train the UK's future social scientists. Our research informs public policies and helps make businesses, voluntary bodies and other organisations more effective. Most importantly, it makes a real difference to all our lives. The ESRC is an independent organisation, established by Royal Charter in 1965, and funded mainly by the Government. In 2015 the ESRC celebrates its 50th anniversary. http://www.esrc.ac.uk

About the University of Exeter

The University of Exeter is a Russell Group university and in the top one percent of institutions globally. It combines world-class research with very high levels of student satisfaction. Exeter has over 18,000 students and is ranked 8th in The Times and The Sunday Times Good University Guide league table, 10th in The Complete University Guide and 12th in the Guardian University Guide 2014. In the 2008 Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) 90% of the University's research was rated as being at internationally recognised levels and 16 of its 31 subjects are ranked in the top 10, with 27 subjects ranked in the top 20. Exeter was The Sunday Times University of the Year 2012-13.

The University has invested strategically to deliver more than £350 million worth of new facilities across its campuses in the last few years; including landmark new student services centres - the Forum in Exeter and The Exchange on the Penryn Campus in Cornwall, together with world-class new facilities for Biosciences, the Business School and the Environment and Sustainability Institute. There are plans for another £330 million of investment between now and 2016.

http://www.exeter.ac.uk

For further information:

University of Exeter
Press Office
+44 (0)1392 722307or 722062
pressoffice@exeter.ac.uk

Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.