Los Angeles, CA (November 4, 2014) How does an individual's happiness level reflect societal conditions? A new article out today in the first issue of Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences (PIBBS) finds that similar to how GDP measures the effectiveness of economic policies, happiness can and should be used to evaluate the effectiveness of social policies.
Authors Shigehiro Oishi and Ed Diener examined research evaluating the effectiveness of policy related to unemployment rate, tax rate, child care, and environmental issues to determine if it's possible to study how this policy affects individuals' psychological well-being. They found that the research does indeed illustrate the degree of suffering among people in different types of difficult circumstances. For example, recent research has found that people with severe disabilities are roughly two times less satisfied with their lives than those who are merely unemployed. The researchers concluded that such findings can and should help prioritize policy-related welfare programs and regulations.
The researchers wrote, "Self-reported well-being can be used to evaluate whether a specific policy had an impact on population at large. For instance, did a change in an education policy (e.g., No Child Left Behind Act of 2001) increase stress among parents? Self-reported well-being data will provide an answer to such a question."
The researchers wrote that periodically recording (e.g., monthly, quarterly) citizens' well-being will allow policymakers and researchers to test whether a certain policy had an intended effect and whether a society is making progress toward its ideal.
"We believe that an ideal society is a society where citizens feel happy, feel satisfied, and find their lives to be meaningful."
The new PIBBS journal includes 33 articles, published today, on pressing social issues as they relate to policy. The following seven articles relate to general wellbeing and policy. Full-text copies are available to members of the media and can be accessed by emailing email@example.com.
- "Educational Attainment and Life Expectancy" by Robert M. Kaplan, Michael L. Spittel, and Tia L. Zeno
- "Can and Should Happiness Be a Policy Goal?" by Shigehiro Oishi and Ed Diener
- "Reducing Racial Health Care Disparities: A Social Psychological Analysis" by Louis A. Penner, Irene V. Blair, Terrance L. Albrecht, and John F. Dovidio
- "A Multilevel Analysis of Stigma and Health: Implications for Research and Policy" by Laura Smart Richman and Mark L. Hatzenbuehler
- "Public Policy and Health: A Self-Affirmation Perspective" by Phillip J. Ehret and David K. Sherman
- "Relative Deprivation: How Subjective Experiences of Inequality Influence Social Behavior and Health" by Heather J. Smith and Yuen J. Huo
- "Psychological Aspects of Contraception, Unintended Pregnancy, and Abortion" by Julia R. Steinberg and Lisa R. Rubin
SAGE is a leading international publisher of journals, books, and electronic media for academic, educational, and professional markets. Since 1965, SAGE has helped inform and educate a global community of scholars, practitioners, researchers, and students spanning a wide range of subject areas including business, humanities, social sciences, and science, technology, and medicine. An independent company, SAGE has principal offices in Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore and Washington DC. http://www.
Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences is a new annual publication that presents original research and scientific reviews relevant to public policy. This annual will
- Allow scientists to share research that can help build sound policies.
- Allow policymakers to provide feedback to the scientific community regarding research that could address societal challenges.
- Encourage the scientific community to build models that seriously consider implementation to address the needs of society.