Public Release: 

Agent Orange-contaminated airplanes could have affected health of air force reservists

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine

WASHINGTON - Air Force reservists based in the U.S. who worked after the Vietnam War in C-123 aircraft that sprayed Agent Orange during the war could have experienced adverse health effects from exposure to the herbicide, says a new report from the Institute of Medicine. The reservists who served in the contaminated C-123s experienced some degree of exposure to the toxic chemical component of Agent Orange known as TCDD (2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin), and it is plausible, in some cases, that the reservists exceeded TCDD exposure guidelines for workers in enclosed settings.

After their use in Vietnam, 24 C-123 aircraft were added to the fleets of four U.S. Air Force reserve units for use in military airlifts and medical and cargo transport. From 1972 to 1982, approximately 1,500 to 2,100 U.S. Air Force Reserve personnel trained and worked aboard these C-123 aircraft.

After becoming aware that these aircraft had previously sprayed Agent Orange, some Air Force Reservists applied to the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs for compensatory coverage under the Agent Orange Act of 1991 (AO Act), which provides health care and disability coverage for health conditions that have been deemed presumptively service-related and due to herbicide exposure during the Vietnam War. The VA denied the applications on the basis that these reservists were ineligible, because without "boots on the ground" service in Vietnam, they were not covered under the AO Act. However, with knowledge that some air and surface samples from the C-123s taken between 1979 and 2009 showed the presence of Agent Orange residues, representatives of the C-123 Veterans Association began an effort to reverse the VA's position and obtain coverage. The VA asked the IOM to evaluate whether working in the C-123s could have plausibly resulted in exposures detrimental to the health of the Air Force reservists. The IOM was not directed to make any policy determinations concerning the applicability of the AO Act to the group.

The committee that carried out the study and wrote the report examined the results of air and surface sampling for TCDD and herbicides conducted between 1979 and 2009 in three C-123 aircraft and only herbicide results from an additional 10 C-123s. The committee determined that the length of time between the spraying in Vietnam and the TCDD sampling, few sampling data, and minimal information about the reservists' activities on the airplanes made it impossible to accurately estimate the level of TCDD exposure the reservists had experienced. However, because TCDD residues had been detected on interior surfaces of the aircraft, the committee stated with confidence that the reservists were exposed to TCDD to some extent when working in the C-123s. All the relevant samples, which were collected many years after the reservists worked in the planes, fall in or above the range specified as meriting cautionary consideration by international exposure guidelines. Therefore, the committee found it plausible that some of the reservists had problematic increases in their risks of experiencing a variety of adverse health outcomes.

"Detection of TCDD so long after the Air Force reservists worked in the aircraft means that the levels at the time of their exposure would have been at least as high as the taken measurements, and quite possibly, considerably higher," said committee chair Robert Herrick, a senior lecturer on occupational hygiene at the Harvard School of Public Health in Cambridge, Mass.

The committee noted that efforts to recover work records concerning the reservists' use of C-123s have been unsuccessful. Therefore, it is unlikely that any additional information will be become available to establish more definitively the magnitude of exposures experienced by the reservists.


The study was sponsored by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Established in 1970 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, the Institute of Medicine provides independent, objective, evidence-based advice to policymakers, health professionals, the private sector, and the public. The National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council make up the National Academies. A committee roster follows.


Jennifer Walsh
Senior Media Relations Officer

Christina Anderson
Media Relations Assistant

Office of News and Public Information

Twitter: @NAS_news and @NASciences

RSS feed:


Pre-publication copies of Post-Vietnam Dioxin Exposure in Agent Orange-Contaminated C-123 Aircraft are available from the National Academies Press on the Internet at or by calling 202-334-3313 or 1-800-624-6242. Reporters may obtain a copy from the Office of News and

Public Information (contacts listed above).

Institute of Medicine

Board on the Health of Select Populations

Committee to Evaluate the Potential Exposure to Agent Orange/TCDD Residue and Level of Risk of Adverse Health Effects for Aircrew of Post-Vietnam C-123 Aircraft

Robert F. Herrick, Sc.D. (chair)
Senior Lecturer on Occupational Hygiene
Department of Environmental Health
Harvard School of Public Health

Robert Canales, Ph.D., M.S.
Assistant Professor
Community, Environment, and Policy Division
Mel and Enid Zuckerman School of Public Health
University of Arizona

Kenny S. Crump, Ph.D.
Independent Consultant, and
ENVIRON (retired)
Ruston, La.

Melissa Gonzales, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
Division of Epidemiology
University of New Mexico

John C. Kissel, Ph.D., PE
Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences
University of Washington

Linda A. McCauley, Ph.D., R.N., F.A.A.N., F.A.A.O.H.N.
Department of Environmental Health
Rollins School of Public Heath, and
Professor and Dean
Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing
Emory University

Clifford P. Weisel, Ph.D.
Exposure Science Division
Department of Environmental Medicine
Robert Wood Johnson Medical School
Rutgers University
Piscataway, N.J.


Jennifer Cohen
Study Co-Director

Mary Paxton
Study Co-Director

Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.