Public Release: 

Estimating the best time of year for malaria interventions in Africa

PLOS

New methods for analysing malaria transmission can estimate the best time of year to carry out campaigns such as mass drug treatment and spraying of houses with insecticide.

In a study publishing this week in PLOS Computational Biology, Jamie Griffin of Imperial College London uses methods that calculate the effect of interventions against infectious diseases when conditions change seasonally.

The study finds that for malaria in Africa the best time of year for mass drug administration is in the low season, whereas the best time for house spraying, or a vaccine that reduces infection rates, is just before the high season.

An important summary of the dynamics of an infectious disease is the reproduction number, defined as the average number of secondary infections that would result from each infection if everyone were susceptible. The study's author shows how to find the reproduction number, and the number's change due to interventions when the disease has seasonal variation or the intervention effects change over time.

It has been estimated that in some parts of Africa the reproduction number needs to be reduced over 1000-fold in order to locally eliminate malaria. The results of this study can help us to understand how to optimally combine existing interventions. The methods may be applied to novel control measures to assess what contribution they could make to the large reductions in transmission that are needed.

###

All works published in PLOS Computational Biology are Open Access, which means that all content is immediately and freely available. Use this URL in your coverage to provide readers access to the paper upon publication: http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004057

Citation: Griffin JT (2015) The Interaction between Seasonality and Pulsed Interventions against Malaria in Their Effects on the Reproduction Number. PLoS Comput Biol 11(1): e1004057. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004057

Funding: The work was funded by a fellowship from the UK Medical Research Council, grant number G1002284. http://www.mrc.ac.uk/index.htm. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

About PLOS Computational Biology

PLOS Computational Biology features works of exceptional significance that further our understanding of living systems at all scales through the application of computational methods. All works published in PLOS Computational Biology are Open Access. All content is immediately available and subject only to the condition that the original authorship and source are properly attributed. Copyright is retained. For more information follow @PLOSCompBiol on Twitter or contact ploscompbiol@plos.org.

About PLOS

PLOS is a nonprofit publisher and advocacy organization founded to accelerate progress in science and medicine by leading a transformation in research communication. For more information, visit http://www.plos.org.

Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.