News Release

Whooping cough: A small drop in vaccine protection can lead to a case upsurge

Peer-Reviewed Publication

PLOS

Whooping Cough: A Small Drop in Vaccine Protection Can Lead to a Case Upsurge

image: Disease cases of pertussis reported by the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System in the US between the years 1922-2014, shows the decline in disease following the initial use of the DTP (Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis) vaccine, the steady rise in disease beginning around the 1990s, and the recent outbreak years of 2005, 2009 and 2012. Recently-developed vaccines are also indicated: DTaP (Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis) and the adolescent booster vaccine Tdap (Tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis). view more 

Credit: CDC, National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System and Supplemental Pertussis Surveillance System and, between 1922-1949, passive reports to the Public Health Service

In 2012 the USA saw the highest number of pertussis (whooping cough) cases since 1955. New research finds that a likely explanation for this rise in disease is a drop in the degree of vaccine protection for each vaccinated individual.

A team led by Dr. Manoj Gambhir (Monash University, Melbourne, Australia), Dr. Thomas Clark (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, USA), and Professor Neil Ferguson (Imperial College London, UK), worked with 60 years of pertussis disease data to determine what best explained the recent increase in the disease.

In the study published this week in PLOS Computational Biology, the authors investigate several hypotheses for the upsurge in pertussis cases using a mathematical modelling approach. The authors find that the level of protection of the currently-used 'acellular' vaccine is lower than that of the previously-used 'whole-cell' vaccine.

Other explanations of the upsurge in pertussis--most notably a steady increase in the reporting of cases over time, whether through better diagnostic techniques or an increasing awareness among medical practitioners of the disease--do not appear to be as fundamental as a change in protection between the current and former vaccines.

"We used a rigorous procedure for fitting several mathematical models to the data, and we found that a drop in protection was always necessary to reproduce the rising pattern of disease we've seen in the U.S.," says Dr. Gambhir. "Crucially, our model also matches the age pattern of disease."

These results demonstrate that the resurgence in pertussis in the U.S. can be explained by past changes in vaccination policy. However, the authors' findings also suggest that the efficacy of the currently-used acellular vaccine, while lower than that of the whole-cell vaccine, is not much lower (around 80% protection for the first three doses of acellular vaccine versus 90% for whole-cell), and booster doses may be sufficient to curtail epidemics while novel vaccine research continues.

"Pertussis has also been on the rise in several countries around the world, and we are eager to look at data from other countries to see whether the explanation for this is similar to what we found for the US." says Dr. Clark.

###

Image Caption: Disease cases of pertussis reported by the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System in the US between the years 1922-2014, showing the decline in disease following the initial use of the DTP (Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis) vaccine, the steady rise in disease beginning around the 1990s, and the recent outbreak years of 2005, 2009 and 2012. Recently-developed vaccines are also indicated: DTaP (Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis) and the adolescent booster vaccine Tdap (Tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis).

Image Credit: CDC, National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System and Supplemental Pertussis Surveillance System and, between 1922-1949, passive reports to the Public Health Service

Image Link: https://www.plos.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Gambhir-23-Apr.jpg

All works published in PLOS Computational Biology are Open Access, which means that all content is immediately and freely available. Use this URL in your coverage to provide readers access to the paper upon publication: http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004138

Contact: Manoj Gambhir
Address: Monash University
Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine
The Alfred Centre
99 Commercial Road
Melbourne, Victoria 3004
AUSTRALIA
Phone: +61 421 816 813
Email: manoj.gambhir@monash.edu

Citation: Gambhir M, Clark TA, Cauchemez S, Tartof SY, Swerdlow DL, Ferguson NM (2015) A Change in Vaccine Efficacy and Duration of Protection Explains Recent Rises in Pertussis Incidence in the United States. PLoS Comput Biol 11(4): e1004138.doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004138

Funding: This work was funded by: UK Medical Research Council (Centre funding), Grant Number MR/K010174/1, UK National Institute of Health Research (Health Protection Research Unit funding), Grant Number HPRU-2012-10080, U.S. National Insitutes of Health NIGMS MIDAS (Grant funding): Models for synthesising molecular, clinical and epidemiological data, and translation to public health response, Grant Number 1U01GM110721-01.The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

About PLOS Computational Biology

PLOS Computational Biology features works of exceptional significance that further our understanding of living systems at all scales through the application of computational methods. All works published in PLOS Computational Biology are Open Access. All content is immediately available and subject only to the condition that the original authorship and source are properly attributed. Copyright is retained. For more information follow @PLOSCompBiol on Twitter or contact ploscompbiol@plos.org.

About PLOS

PLOS is a nonprofit publisher and advocacy organization founded to accelerate progress in science and medicine by leading a transformation in research communication. For more information, visit http://www.plos.org.


Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.