Public Release: 

'What don't you understand about 'yes' and 'no'?'

New issue of Language features 8 linguistic studies

Linguistic Society of America

The words 'yes' and 'no' may seem like two of the easiest expressions to understand in any language, but their actual behavior and interpretation are surprisingly difficult to pin down. In a paper published earlier today in the scholarly journal Language, two linguists examine the workings of 'yes' and 'no' and show that understanding them leads to new insights concerning the understanding of questions and statements more generally.

Floris Roelofsen (University of Amsterdam) and Donka F. Farkas (UC - Santa Cruz) provide a comprehensive account of 'polarity particles', as these words are called, across languages, and explain the intricate pattern of their distribution. For example, "Yes, it is" and "No, it isn't" are acceptable answers to the question "Is the door open or is it not open?", but not to "Is the door open or is it closed?". Furthermore, the intonation used when pronouncing a sentence can affect whether 'yes' or 'no' are appropriate responses to it.

The distribution of these particles, it turns out, is also affected by the polarity of the sentence they respond to. For example, both "No, he hasn't" and "Yes, he hasn't" are acceptable as agreeing responses to "Ben has not called today", but in an agreeing response to "Ben has called today", "Yes, he has' is acceptable but "No, he has" is not.

Roelofsen and Farkas build on previous insights from semantics and discourse models, as well as on quantitative surveys of how speakers judge various responses. The framework they create not only explains the distribution and interpretation of these particles in English, but also predicts what patterns one expects to find across languages. These predictions are then checked and verified against data from French, German, Romanian, and Hungarian.

###

An open-access version of this article is now available from the Linguistic Society of America, the publishers of Language:

http://www.linguisticsociety.org/files/news/LanguageFarkasRoelofsen.pdf

Other articles that appear in this issue of Language include:

"Patterns of contrast in phonological change: Evidence from Algonquian vowel systems", Will Oxford (University of Manitoba)

"Can phonological universals be emergent?: Modeling the space of sound change, lexical distribution, and hypothesis selection", Rebecca Morley (Ohio State University)

"Case alternations in Ancient Greek Passives and the typology of Case", Elena Anagnostopoulou (University of Crete) and Christina Sevdali (University of Ulster)

Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.