Public Release: 

Mouse model tests health risks of circadian disturbances

Cell Press

People who work outside of the normal 9-5 schedule or experience frequent jet lag have been found to be at an increased risk for everything from weight gain to cancer, but there are too many variables involved to conduct multi-decade, controlled studies in humans to confirm whether sleep pattern disruption is a correlation or the cause.

In the July 20 issue of Current Biology, Dutch researchers present the next best thing: an experimental model that subjects mice to human-relevant circadian rhythm disturbances. The model provides early causal evidence that weekly alternating light-dark cycles may hasten certain health risks.

In the first study using this model, the researchers--based at the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) in the Netherlands and at the Erasmus University Medical Center--studied female mice with a genetic predisposition to breast cancer, comparable to women who carry a BRCA or a Li-Fraumeni p53 mutation. Typically these mice will develop breast cancer in 50 weeks, but onset was 8 weeks earlier when the mice experienced circadian rhythm disturbances. The mice subjected to the alternative light-dark cycles also gained about 20% more weight than those that were not.

"The conclusion is that chronic changes in light schedules are a driving factor for breast cancer development, weight gain, and other metabolic problems," says senior study author Bert van der Horst of Erasmus University Medical Center. In addition, as analyzed by Till Roenneberg (Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany), sleep patterns were chronically disturbed. "This outcome is in line with what has been found in epidemiological studies in humans, and now provides strong causal evidence for circadian disruption as a carcinogenic factor."

"There are not many long-term studies like this in animals, and hardly anybody sees effects on weight gain," adds co-author Harry van Steeg of RIVM, "so to have two endpoints coinciding--early tumor development and weight gain--is surprising." Additionally, the authors claim to have an ideal experimental setting to study effects of intervention scenarios on long-term adverse health outcomes.

Critics of human circadian disruption studies have pointed to lifestyle factors as a possible contributor to this increased health risk. For instance, women who work nights have also been found to have children at a later age, eat less healthy, exercise less, and drink more alcohol--all factors associated with weight gain and breast cancer. Other possible contributors include internal desynchronization, melatonin suppression, poor sleep, and lack of sunlight. In their mouse study, van der Horst and van Steeg showed that at least low Vitamin D levels (lack of sunlight) or melatonin suppression are not underlying factors in weight gain and breast cancer development, which is further evidence that circadian rhythm disruption is a driver.

"One of the questions we often get is to what extent does a mouse resemble humans," says van der Horst. "The mechanism of the circadian clock as well as carcinogenesis is comparable in mice and man, and this model opens new avenues for further exploring how circadian disruptions affect the body and how you can intervene to reduce adverse effects."

In addition, the researchers are looking for biomarkers in mice and humans that would indicate that circadian rhythms are being disturbed.


This research received financial support from the RIVM Strategic Program and the Dutch Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment.

Current Biology, Van Dycke et al.: "Chronically alternating light cycles increase breast cancer risk in mice"

Current Biology, published by Cell Press, is a bimonthly journal that features papers across all areas of biology. Current Biology strives to foster communication across fields of biology, both by publishing important findings of general interest and through highly accessible front matter for non-specialists. For more information please visit To receive media alerts for Current Biology or other Cell Press journals, contact

Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.