In order to roost upside down on cave ceilings or tree limbs, bats need to perform an aerobatic feat unlike anything else in the animal world. In an article publishing in the Open Access journal PLOS Biology on 16th November, researchers from Brown University have shown that it's the extra mass in bats' beefy wings that makes the maneuver possible.
PROVIDENCE, RI (Brown University) -- Compared to birds and insects, bats have heavy wings for their body size. Those comparatively cumbersome flappers might seem a detriment to maneuverability, but new research shows that bats' extra wing mass makes possible a quintessential bit of aerobatics: the ability to land upside down.
"Bats land in a unique way," said Sharon Swartz, a biologist at Brown University who was a senior author of the new research along with Kenny Breuer from Brown's School of Engineering. "They have to go from flying with their heads forward to executing an acrobatic maneuver that puts them head down and feet up. No other flying animal lands the same way as bats do."
But exactly how they are able to generate the forces necessary to perform those maneuvers hadn't been clear.
"When they come in to land they're not moving very fast, which makes it hard to generate the aerodynamic forces needed to reorient themselves," Breuer said. "So the question is, how do bats get themselves in position to land?"
Using a special flight enclosure, high-speed cameras and some sophisticated computer modeling, the researchers showed that it has a lot to do with wing mass and inertia. Bats' wings are heavy, hand-like assemblages of bone, muscles, joints, tendons and skin. By throwing that extra wing weight around in very precise ways, bats generate inertial forces in order to reorient themselves, rather than relying on the aerodynamic forces generated by pushing against the air.
It's similar, Breuer says, to the way high divers shift their weight to perform flips and twists, or the way cats reorient themselves to land feet-down when they fall.
The findings are to be published in the Open Access journal PLOS Biology on November 16th 2015.
For the study, led by Attila Bergou, a former post-doc in Breuer's lab, the researchers trained bats from two different species to fly into an enclosure and land on a small piece of mesh fixed to the ceiling. High-speed cameras were able to catch a subtle wing maneuver that the bats make in the fraction of a second before they land.
The videos showed that as the bats approach the ceiling, they retract one of their wings ever so slightly toward their bodies, while flapping the other at full extension. With each wing beat in that asymmetric configuration, the bats rotate a half turn, helping to put them in position to meet the mesh feet first. In subsequent trials, the researchers removed the mesh from the ceiling, leaving the bats nothing to grab on to. Video of those trials showed that, after attempting to land, the bats performed a similar rolling maneuver using their wings in order to reorient themselves for forward flight.
The researchers then used computer simulations to confirm that the effect they were seeing was due to inertia rather than aerodynamics. They used motion capture to record the bats' movements and then replayed those movements through a computer simulation in which the effects of different forces could be switched on and off. When the simulation was run with aerodynamic forces turned off, the virtual bats were still able to recreate the motion of the real ones.
Similarly, the models allowed manipulation of wing mass parameters. The researchers ran the simulation again with the bats' wing mass reduced to the proportions of a fruit fly, which have very light wings for their body mass. That simulation showed that the landing rotation was not possible in the absence of aerodynamic forces.
"What this tell us is that in bats, with their heavy wings, it's the inertial forces that are more important relative to aerodynamics," Breuer said. "That's a bit of a counterintuitive conclusion. Normally you'd think that an animal would not want to have such massive wings. But here, it turns out that the mass can be used to some benefit"
The research sheds light on the basic biology that helps bats fly and land the way they do, but also may be useful in the development of human-made flying machines.
"From an engineering perspective, there's a lot of interest in drones and flying microvehicles," Breuer said. "Maneuvering or directing those robotic vehicles is a challenge. The idea here is that using redistribution of mass is not a bad approach to take."
The work also provided Brown students with a unique educational opportunity.
"Students are an important part of our research group," Swartz said. "Many undergraduate students collaborate with us in several areas of our research program. One of our co-authors on this work, Lauren Reimnitz, is now is now a veterinarian-in-training at the University of California, Davis. Part of the work for this paper was an element of her undergraduate honors thesis."
Along with Bergou, Reimnitz, Swartz and Breuer, other authors on the paper were Hamid Vejdani, Daniel Riskin, and Gabriel Taubin.
Please mention PLOS Biology as the source for this article and include the links below in your coverage to take readers to the online, open access articles.
All works published in PLOS Biology are open access, which means that everything is immediately and freely available. Use this URL in your coverage to provide readers access to the paper upon publication:
Kevin Stacey (PIO)
Kenny Breuer (email@example.com)
Sharon Swartz (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Citation: Bergou AJ, Swartz SM, Vejdani H, Riskin DK, Reimnitz L, Taubin G, et al. (2015) Falling with
Style: Bats Perform Complex Aerial Rotations by Adjusting Wing Inertia. PLoS Biol 13(11): e1002297.
Funding: This work was supported by the AFOSR MURI program on Bio-inspired flight, AFOSR grant FA9550-12-1-0210 DEF, and NSF grants numbers CCF-0729126, IIS-0808718, IOS-0723392, IOS- 1145549 and CCF-0915661. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.