Canine mediated rabies is endemic in Tanzania despite the fact that the disease can be prevented entirely by mass dog vaccination. Since 2003 the Serengeti Health Initiative has been carrying out rabies vaccination campaigns that aim to achieve the 70% coverage required in order to eliminate rabies. The research team, a partnership among the Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, the Paul G. Allen School for Global Animal Health at Washington State University, and Chicago's Lincoln Park Zoo, studied whether the use of incentives might increase owner participation in the vaccination events, and also examined the most effective way to estimate post-vaccination coverage.
Sixty-two villages were randomly allocated to either a control (no incentives) or one of three incentives: bright colored collars given to the dogs, bright colored wristbands given to the owners and both collars and wristbands handed out. Dog owners were also asked to rate which incentive they preferred. On average, the incentives resulted in 34 more dogs brought for vaccination treatment per village, with no difference seen between the different types of incentives. Given the increase in dog turnout, the researchers estimated the mean reduction in the cost-per-dog and the price-threshold under which the cost of the incentive used must fall to be economically viable. This was $0.47. From the surveys, 41% indicated a preference for the dog collars and 43% for wristbands. 98% of respondents liked the incentives and were happy to see that vaccinated and non-vaccinated dogs could be easily distinguished.
The researchers also tested the accuracy of the two methods normally used to determine vaccine coverage. They tested them against the gold-standard of a village-wide census which, while accurate, is far more expensive than the commonly-used methods of random household questionnaire and transect survey. For the household questionnaire, a locally recruited interviewer was used to facilitate a verbal questionnaire at a minimum of 70 houses per village. For the transect survey, vaccinated dogs were marked with a stripe of water-soluble purple spray. The day following the vaccination, the teams performed a drive through the village estimating the proportion of marked and unmarked dogs. The household questionnaire underestimated coverage by 6.6% while the transect survey overestimated by 7.1%. These estimates were not significantly different from the results of the village-wide census (p = 0.14 and 0.06 respectively).
A reliable method of assessing post-vaccination coverage is vital to check if the elimination coverage of 70% is met. In view of this, the researchers recommend the use of the household questionnaire to give a conservative estimate, particularly as it is more likely to pick up vaccination of puppies. The use of incentives is also recommended, to alert and remind villages to take their dogs to the vaccination centers, as well as providing a way of distinguishing vaccinated and non-vaccinated dogs.
Please contact firstname.lastname@example.org if you would like more information about our content and specific topics of interest.
All works published in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases are open access, which means that everything is immediately and freely available. Use this URL in your coverage to provide readers access to the paper upon publication:
Funding: The Commission for Science and Technology is the funding agent through The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology with grant number NM-AIST/M.067/T.12. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
About PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal devoted to the pathology, epidemiology, prevention, treatment, and control of the neglected tropical diseases, as well as public policy relevant to this group of diseases. All works published in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases are open access, which means that everything is immediately and freely available subject only to the condition that the original authorship and source are properly attributed. The Public Library of Science uses the Creative Commons Attribution License, and copyright is retained by the authors.
About the Public Library of Science
The Public Library of Science (PLOS) is a non-profit organization of scientists and physicians committed to making the world's scientific and medical literature a freely available public resource. For more information, visit http://www.
PLOS Journals publish under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits free reuse of all materials published with the article, so long as the work is cited (e.g., Kaltenbach LS et al. (2007) Huntington Interacting Proteins Are Genetic Modifiers of Neurodegeneration. PLOS Genet 3(5): e82. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030082). No prior permission is required from the authors or publisher. For queries about the license, please contact the relative journal contact indicated here: http://www.