Public Release: 

Cholera vaccine study in Haiti suggests problems with current booster regimen



IMAGE: This is a picture of cholera bacteria. view more

Credit: Public Domain

Cholera outbreaks are on the rise. To prevent and control them, three oral cholera vaccines are currently approved by WHO. A study published in PLOS NTDs examining the immune response to one of them in Haitian adults finds that while the first vaccine round elicits a strong cholera-specific response in the mucosa (the first point of contact with the cholera pathogen), the booster dose after 2 weeks does not appear to stimulate the immune system further.

After initial approval of a new vaccine, research often continues and involves the testing in different populations and of different dosing regimens. Jason Harris, from Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, USA, and colleagues are studying a bivalent whole cell oral (BivWC) cholera vaccine produced in India that received pre-approval by WHO in 2011. The vaccine is increasingly being used in endemic settings to prevent outbreaks, and also is part of a WHO cholera vaccine stockpile for use in a rapid response to a new outbreak.

In this study, the researchers examined how strong an immune response the vaccine provokes in adults in Haiti. (Haiti had not experienced a recent cholera outbreak prior to 2010 when UN personnel accidentally introduced the pathogen following a devastating earthquake.) Cholera is now endemic in Haiti, and many people have had exposure to cholera bacteria and may have some pre-existing level of immunity.

The first level of contact with live cholera bacteria -- or their dead counterparts contained in oral cholera vaccines -- occurs in the mucosa of the gut. This triggers the development of cholera-specific antibody secreting cells (ASCs) which transiently migrate out of the gut and into the blood circulation. Because detection of ASCs in the blood provides an early correlate of subsequent immune memory in the gut mucosa, the researchers focused on these responses at multiple time points following BivWC vaccination in 24 healthy Haitian adults.

Participants received oral BivWC vaccine on days 0 and 14 (following the recommended regimen of two doses 14 days apart), and the researchers drew blood at day 0, and at 7 days following each vaccine dose (days 7 and 21). BivWC, they found, induced development of robust immune responses following the first dose of vaccine. The magnitude of these responses did not appear to be associated with recent exposure to cholera. In contrast, similar ASC responses were not detected following the second dose of vaccination.

Their results, the researchers say, suggest "that the currently recommended 14-day interval between doses may not be optimal for boosting mucosal immune responses among adults in cholera endemic regions". Given similar results from studies of a different oral cholera vaccine in Asia, the researchers argue that "additional evaluation of the optimal dosing schedule for oral cholera vaccines with the goal of improving long-term immunity is warranted".


Please contact if you would like more information about our content and specific topics of interest.

All works published in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases are open access, which means that everything is immediately and freely available. Use this URL in your coverage to provide readers access to the paper upon publication: (Link goes live upon article publication)


This research was supported by core grants to the icddr,b, the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation through a grant supporting the Doris Duke International Clinical Research Fellows Program at Harvard Medical School (WRM), through programs funded by the National Institutes of Health, including the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI099243 [JBH and LCI], AI103055 [JBH], AI106878 [ETR and FQ], and K08 AI089721 [RCC]), and the Intramural Research Program of the NIH and NIDDK (PX and PK), the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Harold Amos Medical Faculty Development Program [RCC], the Abundance foundation [LCI]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing Interests:

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

About PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal devoted to the pathology, epidemiology, prevention, treatment, and control of the neglected tropical diseases, as well as public policy relevant to this group of diseases. Please contact if you would like more information about our content and specific topics of interest.

Media and Copyright Information

For information about PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases relevant to journalists, bloggers and press officers, including details of our press release process and embargo policy, visit .

PLOS Journals publish under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits free reuse of all materials published with the article, so long as the work is cited.

About the Public Library of Science

The Public Library of Science (PLOS) PLOS is a nonprofit publisher and advocacy organization founded to accelerate progress in science and medicine by leading a transformation in research communication. For more information, visit


This press release refers to upcoming articles in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. The releases have been provided by the article authors and/or journal staff. Any opinions expressed in these are the personal views of the contributors, and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of PLOS. PLOS expressly disclaims any and all warranties and liability in connection with the information found in the release and article and your use of such information.

Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.