The success of ecological restoration projects around the world could be boosted using a potential new tool that monitors soil microbes.
Published in the journal Molecular Ecology, University of Adelaide researchers have shown how the community of bacteria present in the soil of land that had been cleared and grazed for 100 years was returned to its natural state just eight years after revegetation with native plants.
The researchers used next generation sequencing of the DNA in soil from samples taken across the site that had a range of plantings between six and 10 years old.
The technique - high-throughput amplicon sequencing of environmental DNA (eDNA), otherwise known as eDNA metabarcoding - identifies and quantifies the different species of bacteria in a sample.
"Ecological restoration is an important management intervention used to combat biodiversity declines and land degradation around the world, and has very ambitious targets set under the Bonn Challenge and extended at the 2015 Paris climate talks," says Professor Andy Lowe, Chair of Plant Conservation Biology in the University's Environment Institute.
"The success of these impressive goals will rely on delivering effective restoration interventions, but there are concerns that intended outcomes are not being reached. Most projects are insufficiently monitored, if at all, and where it does occur the monitoring is logistically demanding, hard to standardise, and largely discounts the microbial community."
The researchers - students Nick Gellie and Jacob Mills, Dr Martin Breed and Professor Lowe - analysed soil samples at the restoration site at Mt Bold Reservoir in the Adelaide Hills, South Australia, and compared them with neighbouring wilderness areas as 'reference sites'.
"We showed that the bacterial community of an old field which had been grazed for over 100 years had recovered to a state similar to the natural habitat following native plant revegetation - an amazing success story," says Dr Breed, Research Fellow in the Environment Institute.
"A dramatic change in the bacterial community were observed after just eight years of revegetation. The bacterial communities in younger restoration sites were more similar to cleared sites, and older sites were more similar to the remnant patches of woodland."
The researchers say that eDNA metabarcoding holds great promise as a cost-effective, scalable and uniform ecological monitoring tool to assess the success of the restoration.
"Although still needing further development, this tool has significant scope for improving the efficacy of restoration interventions more broadly and ensuring the global targets set are achieved," says PhD student Nick Gellie, lead author of the work.
Media Contact: Professor Andrew Lowe, Chair of Plant Conservation Biology, Environment Institute, University of Adelaide. Mobile: +61 (0)434 607 705, firstname.lastname@example.org
Dr Martin Breed, Research Fellow, Environment Institute, University of Adelaide. Phone: +61 (0) 8 8313 1706. Mobile: +61 (0) 424 166 556, email@example.com
Robyn Mills, Media Officer, Phone: +61 (0)8 8313 6341, Mobile: +61 (0)410 689 084, firstname.lastname@example.org