A population-based study that analyzed data for nearly 1.7 million people born in Sweden suggests family-related factors, rather than causal teratogenic effects (birth defect causing), may explain much of the association between smoking during pregnancy and severe mental illness in offspring, according to a new article published by JAMA Psychiatry.
Recent studies have suggested potential associations between smoking during pregnancy and later bipolar disorder, schizophrenia and other related outcomes in offspring, which raises questions about the possibility that smoking during pregnancy has causal teratogenic effects. About 8 percent of pregnant women in the United States smoke, according to the article.
The study by Patrick D. Quinn, Ph.D., of Indiana University, Bloomington, and coauthors used population-level data and family-based comparisons of cousins and siblings to examine smoking during pregnancy and severe mental illness (defined as bipolar disorder and schizophrenia spectrum disorders) in offspring. Sibling comparisons were used because they are a strong test of a hypothesis about something that might cause birth defects because they rule out all the genetic and environmental influences that make siblings similar to one another.
At the population-level, offspring exposed to moderate and high levels of smoking during pregnancy had greater severe mental illness rates than those offspring who were unexposed but those associations decreased when familial factors were considered. The associations were weaker still and statistically nonsignificant in sibling comparisons, according to the results.
The study notes several limitations, including self-reported maternal smoking during pregnancy.
"This population- and family-based study failed to find support for a causal effect of smoking during pregnancy on risk of severe mental illness in offspring. Rather, these results suggest that much of the observed population-level association can be explained by measured and unmeasured factors shared by siblings," the article concludes.
For more details and to read the full study, please visit the For The Media website.
(JAMA Psychiatry. Published online May 3, 2017. doi:10.1001/ jamapsychiatry.2017.0456; available pre-embargo at the For The Media website.)
Editor's Note: The article contains conflict of interest and funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.