Public Release: 

Compliance with indoor tanning legislation needs improvement to mitigate risks

BioMed Central

Compliance with legislation intended to mitigate the risks associated with indoor tanning varies widely between countries and individual facilities and is generally poor, a study published in the open access journal BMC Public Health suggests. This may reduce its intended protective effect on public health.

Researchers at the University of Guelph, Canada conducted a systematic review of 16 peer-reviewed studies, which assessed compliance with indoor tanning legislation in five countries; the US, Germany, France, Australia and Chile.

The authors reviewed compliance with age restriction requirements, parental consent or accompaniment, protective eyewear, warning labels, health risk information, health benefit information, and risk restrictions, such as a minimum of 48 hours between individual tanning sessions.

Jessica Reimann, a PhD Candidate and the lead author of the study said: "We were surprised by the extent to which compliance varied from one aspect of legislation to the next. For example, compliance with providing protective eyewear was quite high at 92% on average while compliance with youth access restrictions was low at only 34% on average."

Dr. Jennifer McWhirter, a professor and the corresponding author added: "Non-compliance with communicating risks, posting warning signs, or making misleading health claims was also common, suggesting tanners may not be getting appropriate health information or, worse, may even be receiving misinformation."

The authors suggest that with the global incidence of skin cancer increasing and especially young people at increased risk from UV exposure, greater compliance is needed especially for indoor tanning risk communication and youth access.

Jessica Reimann said: "We need greater enforcement to protect the public. Checking on compliance in-person at tanning salons is an effective means to do this. Legislative amendments may also help to ensure young people are not indoor tanning. For example, removing parental consent exemptions in favour of outright youth bans would likely do a better job at deterring use of tanning beds by young people."

Considering successful strategies from other public health initiatives, such as alcohol and tobacco control, may be helpful when drafting future indoor tanning legislation, for example by monitoring and enforcing age restrictions of 18 years or higher. Putting a tax on tanning where it doesn't already exist, could fund inspections and may deter customers, according to the authors.

The authors caution that due to differences in legislation between countries and varying definitions of compliance between studies, as well as variable study designs and temporal and geographic differences, comparisons across studies were challenging. As the majority of studies examined in this review were conducted in the US, this may limit the generalizability of the findings.

###

Media Contact

Anne Korn
Communications Manager
BMC
T: +44 (0)20 3192 2744
E: anne.korn@biomedcentral.com

Notes to editor:

1. Research article:

A systematic review of compliance with indoor tanning legislation

BMC Public Health 2018

DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5994-4

After the embargo lifts, the article will be available here:

https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-018-5994-4

Please name the journal in any story you write. If you are writing for the web, please link to the article. All articles are available free of charge, according to BMC's open access policy.

2. BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.

3. A pioneer of open access publishing, BMC has an evolving portfolio of high quality peer-reviewed journals including broad interest titles such as BMC Biology and BMC Medicine, specialist journals such as Malaria Journal and Microbiome, and the BMC series. At BMC, research is always in progress. We are committed to continual innovation to better support the needs of our communities, ensuring the integrity of the research we publish, and championing the benefits of open research. BMC is part of Springer Nature, giving us greater opportunities to help authors connect and advance discoveries across the world.

Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.