News Release

Educational intervention cuts unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions in China

Peer-Reviewed Publication

PLOS

Educational Intervention Cuts Unnecessary Antibiotic Prescriptions in China

image: An educational intervention aimed at rural Chinese primary care doctors reduced antibiotic prescriptions for childhood upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) by 36 percent, even a year after the intervention ended. view more 

Credit: pxhere.com

An educational intervention aimed at rural Chinese primary care doctors reduced antibiotic prescriptions for childhood upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) by 36%, even a year after the intervention ended, according to a study published this week in PLOS Medicine by Xiaolin Wei from Dalla Lana School of Public Health of the University of Toronto in Canada, Qiang Sun from School of Health Care Management of the Shandong University in China, and colleagues.

In low- and middle-income countries such as China, antibiotics are often prescribed inappropriately to children in primary care for URTIs such as common colds. The new intervention trained rural doctors in the appropriate prescribing of antibiotics, helped these doctors review their own and their colleagues' prescribing practices, and provided education on how to better explain antibiotic prescribing to their patients and patients' caregivers. A randomized trial of the intervention was previously conducted in 25 primary care facilities across two counties in rural China. In the new study, follow-up data were obtained from 14 of those facilities at 12 months after the trial's conclusion.

In intervention facilities, the antibiotic prescription rates (APR) for children aged 2 to 14 years with URTI and no illness requiring antibiotics were 84% at baseline, 37% at 6 months (the trial's completion), and 54% at 18 months and, in control facilities, the rates were 76%, 77%, and 75%, respectively. After adjusting for patient and prescribing doctor covariates, the difference at 6 months represented a difference in the APR of ?49 percentage points (pp) (95% CI ?63 to ?35; P < 0.0001) attributable to the intervention, and at 18-months, a difference of ?36 pp (95% CI ?55 to ?17; P < 0.0001). Compared to the 6-month intervention-control difference, the difference at 18 months represented no statistically significant change: 13 pp (95% CI ?7 to 33; P = 0.21). Factors important to maintaining these reductions, according to the results of in-depth interviews with doctors, included improved knowledge and communication skills and focused prescription review meetings.

"Evidence from our trial and this long-term follow-up study shows that our intervention appears to have changed doctors' knowledge and attitudes and led to long-term benefits in antibiotic prescribing," the authors say. However, they also caution that refresher training and monitoring is likely to be needed to sustain the effects beyond 18 months.

###

Research Article

Funding:

The study was funded by the Medical Research Council Global Health Trials developmental grant [MR/M022161/1] (https://mrc.ukri.org/). The funder of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.

Competing Interests:

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Citation:

Wei X, Zhang Z, Hicks JP, Walley JD, King R, Newell JN, et al. (2019) Long-term outcomes of an educational intervention to reduce antibiotic prescribing for childhood upper respiratory tract infections in rural China: Follow-up of a cluster-randomised controlled trial. PLoS Med 16(1): e1002733. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002733

Image Credit: pxhere.com

Author Affiliations:

Division of Clinical Public Health and Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
China Global Health Research and Development, Shenzhen, China
Nuffield Centre for International Health and Development, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
School of Health Care Management, Shandong University, Jinan, China
Key Laboratory of Health Economics and Policy Research, National Health Commission, Jinan, China
Guangxi Autonomous Region Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning, China School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China

In your coverage please use this URL to provide access to the freely available paper: http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002733


Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.