News Release

Staghorn coral restoration projects show promise in Florida Keys

Full recovery requires mitigation of stressors related to global warming

Peer-Reviewed Publication

PLOS

Staghorn Coral Restoration Projects Show Promise in Florida Keys

image: Location of the coral restoration foundation™ nursery (24.9882° N, 80.43633° W), coral outplant sites, and reef types. Reef types are from the Unified Florida Coral Reef Tract Map v2.0 (74). Carysfort (1), Molasses (2), and Conch Reefs (3) were used as examples to calculate restoration times based on NOAA Recovery Plan criteria. view more 

Credit: Ware et al, 2020 (PLOS ONE, CC BY 4.0)

A new analysis of reef restoration projects in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary suggests they could play a key role in helping staghorn coral (Acropora cervicornis) recover from being endangered. Matthew Ware of Florida State University in Tallahassee and colleagues present these findings in the open-access journal PLOS ONE on May 6, 2020.

Once widespread in Caribbean reefs, staghorn coral populations have declined by over 90 percent since the 1970s. After the species was listed as Threatened under the U.S. Endangered Species Act in 2006, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) initiated a recovery plan. A central part of this plan is outplanting, in which corals are cultivated in a protected area before being transplanted to the restoration site.

While outplanting efforts have been in place for many years, only recently has enough time passed to analyze their long-term potential. Now, Ware and colleagues have applied photographic monitoring and in-person measurements to assess 2,419 staghorn coral colonies outplanted to 20 different sites in the Florida Keys between 2007 and 2013 by the Coral Restoration Project.

The analysis revealed that survivorship--the percentage of colonies containing living tissue--was high for the first two years after outplanting, but declined in subsequent years. The researchers used statistical modeling to predict future survivorship, finding that 0 to 10 percent of the colonies would survive seven years post-outplanting. This means that large numbers of colonies need to be outplanted to start, so ecologically relevant numbers survive longer-term. Coral growth rates were similar to the wild population.

The authors acknowledge some limitations of their analysis, including a lack of comparison to natural populations at outplant sites, differences in colony numbers and outplant strategies among sites, and low sample sizes for some years.

Still, the findings suggest that outplanting could help restore staghorn coral populations by protecting against local extinction and maintaining genetic diversity in the wild. Meanwhile, the same major stressors that have plagued these corals over the last few decades--disease and bleaching, both related to global warming--remain. The new findings support NOAA conclusions that mitigating these stressors is needed to achieve full, long-term recovery.

###

Citation: Ware M, Garfield EN, Nedimyer K, Levy J, Kaufman L, Precht W, et al. (2020) Survivorship and growth in staghorn coral (Acropora cervicornis) outplanting projects in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. PLoS ONE 15(5): e0231817. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231817

Funding: An award by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act to the Coral Restoration Foundation™ (to CRF and KN, with financial administration by the Nature Conservancy) funded outplant work in 2012. A partnership with the Nature Conservancy supported work in 2013. NOAA's Coral Reef Conservation Program (NA13NMF4630144: https://coralreef.noaa.gov), NOAA's Restoration Center (http://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/grant/coastal-and-marine-habitat-restoration-grants), and the Coral Restoration Foundation™ (http://www.coralrestoration.org) provided additional funding for this project. A Brian Keller Memorial Fellowship at Nova Southeastern University (cnso.nova.edu/tools-resources/brian-keller-memorial-fellowship.html#loan) to MW supported his Master's thesis. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decisions to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing Interests: We have read the journal's policy and Steven Miller may have a competing interest: He is on the board of the Coral Restoration Foundation.

In your coverage please use this URL to provide access to the freely available article in PLOS ONE: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0231817


Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.