News Release

How does the electronic medical record affect physician education?

Study examines pros and cons for doctors training to become kidney specialists

Peer-Reviewed Publication

American Society of Nephrology

Highlight

  • Physicians who are training to become kidney specialists reported that the electronic medical record enhances their education, but the time demands of data and order entry can be a downside.

Washington, DC (June 23, 2020) -- Results from a new study provide insights on the positive and negative effects of the electronic medical record (EMR) on the education of physicians training to become kidney specialists. The findings appear in an upcoming issue of CJASN.

The electronic medical record (EMR) has become an integral part of the US healthcare system over the last decade, and although it has numerous benefits, it may also have unintended, negative consequences. Christina M. Yuan, MD and her colleagues looked at the burdens and benefits of EMR use on one aspect of medicine: the education of US nephrology fellows, or physicians who have completed their residencies and are training to become kidney specialists. "It is important to ask faculty and trainee physicians how they perceive the effects of the EMR on physician education, and to determine what they think is deleterious and what is value-added," said Dr. Yuan.

The team sent an anonymous on-line opinion survey of all 148 US Nephrology program directors to forward to their faculty and fellows. A total of 97 faculty and 72 fellows responded.

Just over half of fellows agreed that the EMR contributed positively to their education--primarily because of ease of access to laboratory and radiology results and ability to access software from home and on personal devices. For more than 40% of respondents, however, EMR function was reported to be slow or disrupted, and these respondents were less likely to agree that the EMR contributed positively to their education. More than 50% of fellows reported that EMR data entry time demands contributed to their reluctance to do procedures, participate in conferences, and prolong patient interactions. Also, 65% of fellows reported that they often or sometimes exceeded work-hour restrictions due to EMR entry time demands.

"Nephrology fellows and faculty who responded to our survey reported that the EMR enhances education and patient care by providing efficient and flexible access to patient lab and x-ray results, but the time demands of data and order entry reduces engagement in educational activities, contributes to work-hour violations, and stifles direct patient interaction," said Dr. Yuan.

An accompanying editorial notes that the electronic health record "is a powerful tool to access health information from any site and improve the efficiency, appropriateness and safety of health care. Despite these potential benefits, usability issues remain a major barrier, contributing to frustration and burnout."

###

Study co-authors include Dustin J. Little, MD, Eric S. Marks, MD, Maura A. Watson, DO, Rajeev Raghavan, MD, and Robert Nee, MD.

Disclosures: Dr. Little is employed as a research physician at AstraZeneca. The authors reported no other financial disclosures.

The article, entitled "The Electronic Medical Record and Nephrology Fellowship Education in the United States: An Opinion Survey," will appear online at http://cjasn.asnjournals.org/ on June 23, 2020, doi: 10.2215/CJN.14191119.

The editorial, entitled "From Nihilism to Opportunity: The Educational Potential of the Electronic Health Record," will appear online at http://cjasn.asnjournals.org/ on June 23, 2020, doi: 10.2215/CJN.07260520.

The content of this article does not reflect the views or opinions of The American Society of Nephrology (ASN). Responsibility for the information and views expressed therein lies entirely with the author(s). ASN does not offer medical advice. All content in ASN publications is for informational purposes only, and is not intended to cover all possible uses, directions, precautions, drug interactions, or adverse effects. This content should not be used during a medical emergency or for the diagnosis or treatment of any medical condition. Please consult your doctor or other qualified health care provider if you have any questions about a medical condition, or before taking any drug, changing your diet or commencing or discontinuing any course of treatment. Do not ignore or delay obtaining professional medical advice because of information accessed through ASN. Call 911 or your doctor for all medical emergencies.

Since 1966, ASN has been leading the fight to prevent, treat, and cure kidney diseases throughout the world by educating health professionals and scientists, advancing research and innovation, communicating new knowledge, and advocating for the highest quality care for patients. ASN has more than 21,000 members representing 131 countries. For more information, visit http://www.asn-online.org.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy of the Department of Army/Navy/Air Force, Department of Defense, or U.S. Government.


Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.