News Release

Inhibition of HDAC and mTOR may improve outcomes for relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma

Peer-Reviewed Publication

American Association for Cancer Research

Bottom Line:

The histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor vorinostat (Zolinza) in combination with the mTOR inhibitor sirolimus (Rapamune) or everolimus (Afinitor) showed clinical efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma, according to results from a phase I clinical trial.

Journal in Which the Study was Published:

Clinical Cancer Research, a journal of the American Association for Cancer Research

Author:

Filip Janku, MD, PhD, an associate professor at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Background:

"While the majority of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma have favorable outcomes with standard treatment, approximately 20-30 percent of patients with advanced disease develop refractory disease after primary treatment," said Janku. "These patients typically have poor outcomes with five-year survival rates as low as 30 percent."

Histone deacetylases (HDACs) are cellular proteins that regulate gene expression. Aberrant HDAC expression is associated with cancer, and HDAC inhibitors have been approved for the treatment of certain blood cancers. Resistance to HDAC inhibition in Hodgkin lymphoma has been suggested to develop through activation of mTOR signaling, which regulates cellular proliferation and cell death, explained Janku. Thus, combining HDAC inhibition with an mTOR inhibitor could help prevent resistance and improve responses to treatment, he noted.

Prior preclinical research demonstrated that combined inhibition of HDACs and mTOR signaling had antitumor effects against Hodgkin lymphoma. Furthermore, a patient with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma who received treatment with vorinostat and sirolimus as part of a phase I clinical trial had a partial response to the treatment.

How the Study was Conducted:

In this study, Janku and colleagues examined the clinical efficacy of vorinostat in combination with either sirolimus or everolimus in a larger cohort of patients with heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma who had received a median of five prior therapies. The cohort included 40 adult patients; of these patients, 22 received the vorinostat and sirolimus combination, and 18 received the vorinostat and everolimus combination.

Results:

The objective response rate for patients in the vorinostat and sirolimus arm was 55 percent, with six complete responses and six partial responses. After a median follow-up of 43.3 months, the median progression-free survival was 5.3 months. Median overall survival had not been reached at the time of analysis.

The objective response rate for patients in the vorinostat and everolimus arm was 33 percent, with two complete responses and four partial responses. After a median follow-up of 21 months, the median progression-free survival was 4.8 months. Median overall survival had not been reached at the time of analysis.

All 40 patients were evaluated for adverse events. The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events in both treatment groups were thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and anemia. There were no treatment-related deaths.

Author's Comments:

"In our study, we observed a relatively high objective response rate in a patient population that would otherwise have poor outcomes," said Janku. "Based on our results, I believe further investigation is warranted for these combination treatments."

Janku added that his future research will examine the efficacy of these combinations with immune checkpoint inhibition. "There is evidence that both mTOR and HDAC inhibitors affect the tumor microenvironment, so there may be a benefit to combining these inhibitors with immunotherapy," he noted.

Study Limitations:

A limitation of the study is that it was conducted prior to the approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors for relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma and therefore does not account for prior treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. An additional limitation is that the trial was conducted at a single institution.

###

Funding & Disclosures:

The study was supported by the Non-Standard of Care Clinical Charge Program at MD Anderson, the Sheikh Khalifa Al Nahyan Bin Zayed Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy at MD Anderson, the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, and the National Institutes of Health through MD Anderson's Cancer Center Support Grant.

Janku has received support from Novartis, Genentech, BioMed Valley Discoveries, Astellas, Agios, Plexxikon, Deciphera, Piqur, Symphogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Asana, and Proximagen. Janku has served on the scientific advisory boards of Guardant Health, IFM Therapeutics, Synlogic, and Deciphera; is a consultant for Trovagene and Immunomet; and has ownership interests in Trovagene.

About the American Association for Cancer Research

Founded in 1907, the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) is the world's first and largest professional organization dedicated to advancing cancer research and its mission to prevent and cure cancer. AACR membership includes 47,000 laboratory, translational, and clinical researchers; population scientists; other health care professionals; and patient advocates residing in 127 countries. The AACR marshals the full spectrum of expertise of the cancer community to accelerate progress in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer by annually convening more than 30 conferences and educational workshops--the largest of which is the AACR Annual Meeting, with more than 100,000 attendees for the 2020 virtual meetings and more than 22,500 attendees for past in-person meetings. In addition, the AACR publishes nine prestigious, peer-reviewed scientific journals and a magazine for cancer survivors, patients, and their caregivers. The AACR funds meritorious research directly as well as in cooperation with numerous cancer organizations. As the Scientific Partner of Stand Up To Cancer, the AACR provides expert peer review, grants administration, and scientific oversight of team science and individual investigator grants in cancer research that have the potential for near-term patient benefit. The AACR actively communicates with legislators and other policymakers about the value of cancer research and related biomedical science in saving lives from cancer. For more information about the AACR, visit http://www.AACR.org.

To interview Filip Janku, please contact Richard Lobb at richard.lobb@aacr.org or 215-906-3322. For a photo of Janku, click here. Visit our newsroom.


Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.