News Release

Dogs may not return their owners' good deeds

In experiments, dogs did not reciprocate food-giving nor act more favorably towards helpful humans

Peer-Reviewed Publication

PLOS

Dogs may not return their owners' good deeds

image: Pet dog being fed view more 

Credit: Rebecca Fränzle

Domestic dogs show many adaptations to living closely with humans, but they do not seem to reciprocate food-giving according to a study, publishing July 14 in the open-access journal PLOS ONE, led by Jim McGetrick and colleagues at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna, Austria.

The researchers trained 37 domestic dogs to operate a food dispenser by pressing a button, before separating the button and dispenser in separate enclosures. In the first stage, dogs were paired with two unfamiliar humans one at a time. One human partner was helpful - pressing their button to dispense food in the dog's enclosure - and one was unhelpful. The researchers also reversed the set-up, with a button in the dog's enclosure that operated a food dispenser in the human's enclosure. They found no significant differences in the dogs' tendency to press the button for helpful or unhelpful human partners, and the human's behavior in the first stage did not affect the dog's behavior towards them in free interaction sessions after the trials.

Previous studies have demonstrated that dogs are capable of directing helpful behaviors towards other dogs that have helped them previously - a behavior known as reciprocal altruism - and research suggests dogs are also able to distinguish between cooperative and uncooperative humans. However, the present study failed to find evidence that dogs can combine these capabilities to reciprocate help from humans. This finding may reflect a lack of ability or inclination among dogs to reciprocate, or the experimental design may not have detected it. For example, the authors suggest that the dogs may not have understood the experiment because humans are typically the food-giver in the relationship, not the receiver, or because the dogs failed to recognize the connection between the human's helpful behavior and the reward.

The authors add: "In our study, pet dogs received food from humans but did not return the favour."

###

Citation: McGetrick J, Poncet L, Amann M, Schullern-Schrattenhofen J, Fux L, Martínez M, et al. (2021) Dogs fail to reciprocate the receipt of food from a human in a food-giving task. PLoS ONE 16(7): e0253277. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253277

Funding: JM was funded by a DOC fellowship of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (ÖAW) (https://www.oeaw.ac.at/en/austrian-academy-of-sciences/) at the Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna. JM and FR were funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) (https://www.fwf.ac.at/de/) number W1262-B29. MM was funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) number P30704 (https://www.fwf.ac.at/de/). The funders of this study did not play any role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

In your coverage please use this URL to provide access to the freely available article in PLOS ONE: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0253277


Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.