News Release

Since Roe was overturned, fewer Michigan adults want to have children

Peer-Reviewed Publication

Michigan State University

Jan. 10, 2024

MSU has a satellite uplink/LTN TV studio and Comrex line for radio interviews upon request.

Contact: Kim Ward, University Communications: (517) 432-0117, kward@msu.edu             

Since Roe was overturned, fewer Michigan adults want to have children

EAST LANSING, Mich. – When the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, it created uncertainty for Americans’ access to abortion and other forms of reproductive health care. This uncertainly may have led to an increase in the number of Michigan adults who said they never want to have children, according to Michigan State University researchers.

“Before the Supreme Court overturned Roe through the Dobbs v. Jackson decision, about 21% of Michigan adults did not want children, or were ‘childfree,’” said Jennifer Watling Neal, MSU professor of psychology and co-author of the study. “But this number jumped to 26% after the Supreme Court decided that access to abortion is not protected by the U.S. Constitution.”

The study, published in PLOS One, used data from MSU’s State of the State Survey, conducted by the university’s Institute for Public Policy and Social Research. It focused on a representative sample of 2,500 adults surveyed in the months before the Supreme Court’s decision on Dobbs v. Jackson was leaked and a representative sample of 2,000 adults surveyed in the months after the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs was announced.

“We knew that childfree adults were a large group in Michigan, but with more uncertainty around reproductive health care, even more adults don’t want children than before,” said Zachary Neal, MSU professor of psychology and co-author of the study. “After taking into account adults’ sex, age, race and education, the probability that a Michigan adult never wants children increased by almost a third.”

In late 2022, following the passage of Proposal 3, which protects the right to reproductive freedom, the Michigan Constitution was amended to protect access to abortion. However, Watling Neal explained, “That protection came only after a lot of uncertainty and legal chaos, which may have led potential parents to decide having children simply isn’t worth the health risks.”

Since the Supreme Court’s decision on Dobbs, several other states have either restricted access to reproductive health care or attempted to protect access in their constitutions.

“Our findings suggest that federal and state restrictions on access to reproductive health care may not only harm individuals’ health, but also lead to fewer new births,” said Neal.

The research team will next explore adults’ desires to have children from a global perspective and the role that politics may play in this.

###

Michigan State University has been advancing the common good with uncommon will for more than 165 years. One of the world's leading public research universities, MSU pushes the boundaries of discovery to make a better, safer, healthier world for all while providing life-changing opportunities to a diverse and inclusive academic community through more than 400 programs of study in 17 degree-granting colleges.

For MSU news on the web, go to MSUToday or twitter.com/MSUnews.

 

 


Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.