Study shows how to increase success rate of restoration initiatives in the Cerrado

Statistics made available in January 2024 show that while deforestation in the Amazon fell by half in 2023, it increased 43% in the Cerrado, the Brazilian savanna. A research group at the State University of Campinas’s Institute of Biology (IB-UNICAMP) in Brazil dedicated to ecological studies on the Cerrado have already highlighted the urgency of combating destruction of the biome. However, it is not enough to defend what remains: restoration is also needed.

Restoration presents a number of challenges, such as constant reinvasion by exotic grasses. Once these have been introduced into pasturelands, they spread vigorously, eliminate native species, and disfigure the herbaceous stratum, which is the Cerrado’s biodiversity reserve and the mainstay of its ecosystem services. They are hard to eradicate even after pasture is abandoned. The main plants in question are the tropical forage grasses Urochloa spp., Melinis minutiflora and Andropogon gayanus.

To validate ways of combating invasion or reinvasion by exotic grasses, a pioneering study was conducted by the IB-UNICAMP group at Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park in the state of Goiás, Center-West Brazil. An article on the study by biologist Guilherme Mazzochini and collaborators appears in the Journal of Applied Ecology, a publication of the British Ecological Society (BES).

The study was part of the Thematic Project “Restoring Neotropical dry ecosystems – is plant functional composition the key to success?”, for which the principal investigator is Rafael Oliveira, a professor at IB-UNICAMP. He is also the last author of the article. The penultimate author is Lucy Rowland, a professor at the University of Exeter in the UK. The group is supported by FAPESP and the UK’s Natural Environment Research Council (NERC).

“Many ongoing restoration projects aim to produce rapid plant cover in the area concerned, but in our study, we showed this isn’t always the best strategy. A large proportion of these projects lack a consistent scientific basis and are unsuccessful because they’re unable to create biodiverse ecosystems that can withstand events such as drought, biological invasion and fire. Any restoration initiative must be based on a profound understanding of the ecology of the ecosystem to be restored. Unfortunately, that’s not usually the case,” Oliveira said. He supervised Mazzochini’s postdoctoral research, which was supported by FAPESP.

Biodiversity plays a key role in increasing resistance to invasion by exotic grasses, according to Oliveira. “Our findings show that higher diversity reduces invasion, probably owing to competition for resources in the nutrient-poor, acidic soil of the Cerrado,” he said.

In conventional restoration projects, the typical management strategy deployed to eliminate exotic grasses before native species are planted involves controlled burning followed by frequent plowing during the dry season to remove stolons (above-ground creeping stems) and roots of exotic grasses, as well as to kill seedlings that have recently germinated. However, the exotic species recolonize and dominate restored areas within a few years thanks to the large volume of seeds that remain below ground and the constant influx of seeds from the environs.

“Ecologists have observed for decades that species-rich local communities are more resistant to invasion than species-poor communities. Experiments with biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in regions with a temperate climate have confirmed these observations. In our experiment, plant communities with varying numbers of species were tested to understand how biodiversity influences productivity, nutrient cycling and resistance to invasion, among other things. Our study was the first to conduct an experiment involving biodiversity in the Cerrado and one of only a few ever conducted in the tropics,” Mazzochini said.

Studies involving temperate ecosystems show that communities with more diversity tend to have lower levels of available resources, presumably owing to complementary use of resources by species with different ecological strategies. This reduces invasion by exotic species, which generally require large amounts of resources to maintain rapid growth. “Plants in any environment survive and grow by means of a range of ecological strategies associated with the anatomy and morphology of their leaves, stems and roots. These characteristics are known as functional attributes,” Mazzochini explained.

“Based on functional attributes, plant species can be classified on a spectrum from conservative to acquisitive. The most acquisitive species grow rapidly and have lighter, more tender vegetative organs that need more resources. These species, which include exotic grasses, are considered more competitive. On the other hand, conservative species grow more slowly and have a more robust structure with denser leaves, stems and roots, so that they can withstand adverse conditions such as severe drought and low availability of nutrients.”

Variation in functional attributes is used to classify species along the conservative axis, while ecologists recently introduced the label collaborative to identify adaptability, he explained. The concept centers on specific root length (SRL), defined as resource acquisition (absolute root length) divided by resource investment (mass).

“There’s a direct correlation between SRL and root diameter. Thinner roots can absorb nutrients more autonomously and efficiently. Thicker roots often depend on symbiosis with mycorrhizal fungi, which establish mutualistic relationships with roots, gaining access to nutrients not available to plants, generally phosphorus, and in return receiving the carbon produced by photosynthesis. This is a fascinating example of how plants interrelate with other organisms in order to prosper in many different environments,” he said.

The two axes, conservative and collaborative, were considered in the study, which involved a biodiversity experiment conducted in an area of abandoned pasture taken over by Chapada dos Veados National Park. “We installed 302 square plots measuring 2 m by 2m, and sowed zero to eight native grass species with a density of 1,000 seeds per square meter,” he said.

The eight native species were Axonopus aureus, Axonopus siccus, Andropogon fastigiatus, Aristida flaccida, Aristida riparia, Loudetiopsis chrysothrix, Schizachyrium sanguineum, and Trachypogon spicatus.

As anticipated, a wave of reinvasion by exotic grasses occurred, reflecting the long period during which the area in question had been used as pasture. The invaders were A. gayanus, M. minutiflora, and three species of Urochloa. To assess the invasion of each plot, the researchers removed the exotic species and measured their biomass. In line with the results of biodiversity experiments in temperate ecosystems, they found that communities with relatively high levels of species richness had less exotic biomass. Plots sown with only one native species had 3.6 times more exotic biomass than plots with eight species. This finding raised an important question: What was the mechanism responsible for conferring greater resistance to invasive species on more species-rich communities?

“Our results suggest that more functional diversity in terms of plant height and SRL is associated with a reduction in invasion by exotic species. Height diversity, which relates to native species’ above-ground biomass, appears to create several layers of vegetation, limiting the amount of sunlight that reaches invasive species. As we discovered, SRL diversity is a key factor, indicating that more varied root strategies and the shade provided by above-ground native biomass are effective in reducing invasion. Specifically, the monoculture plots had 4.7 times more exotic biomass on average than the plots with more SRL functional diversity,” Mazzochini said.

This finding is especially important because many herbaceous communities in the Cerrado do not have large amounts of above-ground biomass, as the nutrient-poor, acidic soil limits productivity. Most of the biomass is stored below ground in roots and subterranean structures.

“We also compared the biomass of exotic species on monoculture plots and unseeded plots to see if the presence of native species alone facilitated invasion or competed with invasive species. This analysis showed that the effect of different native species varied. Some native species facilitated the establishment of exotic species, while others reduced invasion, even in the case of monoculture plots. We were surprised to find that the fastest-growing annual native species, A. fastigiatus, facilitated the establishment of exotic species, with 2.9 times more exotic biomass on monoculture than unseeded plots,” Mazzochini said.

This finding could lead to a major revision of the restoration strategies adopted in the Cerrado, as A. fastigiatus is intensely used in restoration projects. Given its rapid growth, the researchers expected it to cover the ground more quickly and prevent invasion by exotic species, but because it is an annual species, it dies early in the dry season and its biomass decomposes and fertilizes the soil, favoring the establishment of fast-growing exotic species in subsequent years.

“To our surprise, the two species that most reduced invasion are the most different in functional terms. S. sanguineum is the smallest, with the longest SRL and the longest total root length. A. siccus is the tallest, with the shortest SRL and the shortest total root length. Plots where one of these species was the monoculture had 73% and 92% less biomass respectively than unseeded plots. These findings contradict the notion that a single native species can be sown with high density to prevent invasion. Instead, the results show the importance of using several ecological strategies when sowing native species for restoration purposes,” Mazzochini said.

For Oliveira, biodiversity is key. “The greater the biodiversity, the greater the likelihood of defeating exotic species. The results also show the importance of revising management and restoration practices that use fast-growing annual or biennial species. Contrary to general belief, these species can facilitate the establishment of invaders over the years,” he said.

The study also received support from FAPESP via two other projects (19/18176-4 and 19/23208-2).

About São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP)

The São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) is a public institution with the mission of supporting scientific research in all fields of knowledge by awarding scholarships, fellowships and grants to investigators linked with higher education and research institutions in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. FAPESP is aware that the very best research can only be done by working with the best researchers internationally. Therefore, it has established partnerships with funding agencies, higher education, private companies, and research organizations in other countries known for the quality of their research and has been encouraging scientists funded by its grants to further develop their international collaboration. You can learn more about FAPESP at www.fapesp.br/en and visit FAPESP news agency at www.agencia.fapesp.br/en to keep updated with the latest scientific breakthroughs FAPESP helps achieve through its many programs, awards and research centers. You may also subscribe to FAPESP news agency at http://agencia.fapesp.br/subscribe.

 

---

---