How useful are states’ adolescent social media laws?

Bills related to adolescent social media regulation have been adopted in more than half of all U.S. states. Research in The Milbank Quarterly finds that these state policies—such as school cell phone bans and anti-cyberbullying laws—have significant limitations. The study identifies research priorities that will help inform more effective interventions.

Because definitive evidence around the potential impacts of social media may take years to emerge, and because the absence of regulation may result in avoidable harm to the public, social media policies have to be designed in the context of imperfect information. In examining these policies, investigators at Columbia University identified three themes connected to state lawmakers’ claims about social media-related adolescent harms: harm to mental health, exposure to dangerous content, and harm to adolescent development.

The researchers found some evidence to support links between social media use and negative outcomes, particularly for vulnerable youth, but overall, current research cannot definitively establish causal effects. They note that research priorities should focus on better characterizing different social media exposures and experiences, understanding relationships between psychiatric symptoms and social media use, and evaluating the impacts of different state policies related to social media.

“We’re seeing policymakers move with increasing urgency to protect youth from the possible negative impacts of social media and digital technologies,” said lead author and doctoral student Marco Thimm-Kaiser. “As technology continues to evolve rapidly, it is critical that policies intended to protect young people are based on rigorous science, while also striking a careful balance between thorough evaluation and timely policy implementation” added senior author Katherine Keyes, PhD.

URL upon publication: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-0009.70021

Additional Information
NOTE: The information contained in this release is protected by copyright. Please include journal attribution in all coverage. For more information or to obtain a PDF of any study, please contact: Sara Henning-Stout, newsroom@wiley.com.

About the Journal
Continuously published since 1923, The Milbank Quarterly is a multidisciplinary journal of population health and health policy that presents original research, synthesis, policy analysis, and commentary from leading thinkers, policymakers, and practitioners. Our goal is to publish scholarly papers that illuminate and add new insights to our understanding of important policy issues involving health, health equity, and health care. The in-depth, multidisciplinary approach of the journal permits contributors to explore fully the social origins of health in our society and to examine in detail the implications of different health policies.

About Wiley      
Wiley is one of the world’s largest publishers and a trusted leader in research and learning. Our industry-leading content, services, platforms, and knowledge networks are tailored to meet the evolving needs of our customers and partners, including researchers, students, instructors, professionals, institutions, and corporations. We empower knowledge-seekers to transform today’s biggest obstacles into tomorrow’s brightest opportunities. For more than two centuries, Wiley has been delivering on its timeless mission to unlock human potential. Visit us at Wiley.com. Follow us on Facebook, X, LinkedIn and Instagram.