A new paper by a team of scientists from across the U.S. provides quantifiable data that can be used by national groups seeking to create guidelines for anal cancer screening.
MUSC Hollings Cancer Center researcher Ashish Deshmukh, Ph.D., co-leader of the Cancer Prevention and Control Research Program at Hollings, is first author on the paper published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, which is the result of nearly a decade of work.
There are two types of anal cancer screening tests – cytology, which looks at cells under a microscope, and HPV testing, which looks for strains of the human papillomavirus that are known to cause cancer.
The tests are similar to those performed for cervical cancer.
“Anal cancer is preventable,” Deshmukh said. “Our study shows that screening for anal cancer has the potential to reduce incidence and death rates by 65% over the lifetime – that's substantial.”
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, however, hasn’t set guidelines for doctors to follow, citing a lack of evidence on harms versus benefits or cost-effectiveness.
“That was the major knowledge gap, and our objective was to address that,” Deshmukh said.
Deshmukh noted that once you take into account the two types of screening, the various ages at which screening might start and the different groups that could be considered for screening, there are dozens of possible combinations.
This work builds off of guidelines written by the International Anal Neoplasia Society, which Deshmukh also helped to write. Those guidelines offer five screening modalities but no specific recommendations on which of those are superior options.
The new paper considered cost-effectiveness and harm versus benefit – in other words, the number of tests that would need to be performed to prevent one case of cancer or to extend one life year.
It focused on men who have sex with men with HIV, the group at highest risk of anal cancer.
The study found that cytology screening every three years among members of this group currently over the age of 35 plus cytology screening every two years for those who become newly eligible for screening at age 35 provides the highest value.
The cost-effectiveness and harm-versus-benefit ratio would likely be different for other groups, Deshmukh noted. In addition, this recommendation could change in the future as more young adults get the HPV vaccine, since the human papillomavirus is responsible for the majority of anal cancers.
“Screening is associated with a lot of anxiety and false positives,” Deshmukh said. “So what we're doing is identifying certain strategies that are associated with a substantial number of false positives over an individual’s lifetime versus certain strategies that may not cause as much harm and anxiety and identifying specific strategies that reduce those harms but maintain the cancer prevention benefit.”
This paper used U.S. dollars and U.S.-based assumptions to develop its recommendations. However, it also provides an “efficiency frontier,” a graphical approach that illustrates the number of screening procedures against the number of cancers prevented, which guideline-writing bodies in other countries could use to write their own guidelines.
“Every country has different screening infrastructure,” Deshmukh said. “So based on their screening infrastructures, they can identify what's optimal and where it falls on the efficiency frontier, given their resources.”
The paper was a collaborative effort, reflecting the work of several academic medical centers, the National Cancer Institute and the International Agency for Research on Cancer.
###
About MUSC Hollings Cancer Center
MUSC Hollings Cancer Center is South Carolina’s only National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center with the largest academic-based cancer research program in the state. With more than 230 faculty cancer scientists from 20 academic departments, it has an annual research funding portfolio of more than $50 million and sponsors more than 200 clinical trials across the state. Hollings specialists include surgeons, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, psychologists and other clinical providers equipped to provide the full range of cancer care from diagnosis to survivorship. Hollings offers state-of-the-art cancer screenings, diagnostics, therapies and surgical techniques within its multidisciplinary clinics. Dedicated to preventing and reducing the cancer burden statewide, the Hollings Office of Community Outreach and Engagement works with community organizations to bring cancer education and prevention information to affected populations throughout the state. For more information, visit hollingscancercenter.musc.edu
Journal
Annals of Internal Medicine
Method of Research
Computational simulation/modeling
Article Title
Screening for Anal Cancer Among Men Who Have Sex With Men With HIV: Benefits, Harms, and Cost-Effectiveness Analyses
Article Publication Date
17-Jun-2025
COI Statement
Dr. Deshmukh consulted Value Analytics Labs and Merck on unrelated projects. Dr. Palefsky consulted Antiva Bioscience, Merck, Vir Biotechnology, and Virion Therapeutics on unrelated projects. to Dr. Gaisa consulted ViiV healthcare and Merck on unrelated projects. Dr. Goldstone has consulted Inovio, Medtronics, Merck, and THD America on unrelated projects. Dr Giuliano reported receiving grants from and serving on the Scientific Advisory Board of Merck. Dr. Sonawane consulted Value Analytics Labs on unrelated projects. Dr. Chhatwal is owner of the Value Analytics Labs.